Monday, 28 February 2011

It's almost March - new poem of the month is here!


In fact I decided to publish two poems for March - one an old classic and one modern. You can read them here. Their topic is the same: a certain beautiful sunny spring flower you see in the pictures above and below. Enjoy and of course let me know what you think!
Spring is coming!

Saturday, 26 February 2011

Review: Beastly by Alex Flinn

  • Reading level: Young Adult
  • Hardcover: 320 pages
  • Publisher: HarperTeen (October 2, 2007)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0060874163
  • ISBN-13: 978-0060874162
  • genre: romantic fairy tale





Synopsis:

A modern retelling of the famous Beauty and the Beast fairy tale.

New York City. Rich, privileged and proud, high school student Kyle Kingsbury leads a life of an exceptionally handsome jerk. It is a very successful life. He knows he can get away with virtually anything - his good looks and his father's money are unstoppable. One day, however, Kyle goes too far - he decides to humiliate a mysterious girl at the school dance. Just because he can. Ok, maybe also because the girl had a cheek to be different than the rest of his posh friends – dressed in black clothes, fat and ugly. Oh, and also because doing so he would score some points with his nasty girlfriend.

The girl turns out to be a witch who casts a spell on Kyle, transforming him into a beast – somebody not only ugly but also dangerous. The only way for Kyle to break the curse is to find true love who will look past his appearance and kiss him returning his feelings. As a kind of favour Kyle is given 2 years to do so. If he fails he will remain the Beast till his death.

The boy and his father, armed with a bunch of credit cards, go on a long and futile pilgrimage from one doctor to the other. Finally Kyle’s father gives up on his son – he sends him to an old, empty house in Brooklyn with a maid, a blind tutor and a broadband Internet connection so he doesn’t offend the eyes of his colleagues and friends. Will the Beast change his ugly, selfish character ? Will he find a girl wise enough to love him?

What I liked:

It is a book with a message which seems to be totally forgotten in most of YA novels; the message which says loud and clearly - looks are not everything. In fact looks will change. For sure.

The narration only explores the side of "the Beast," which I found a nice turn – in the fairy tale we knew only the story of the Beauty. The author does a good job when it comes to the main character - Kyle is a believable teen from today's world. Also we get to see why and how "the Beast" is able to change his horrible ways. It's not just all the sudden he's a changed man, but we see that development. We go from hating Kyle (or at least laughing at him) to rooting for him.Will (the blind tutor) and Magda (the maid) are fantastic guides for Kylie that show him people can be kind even when they do not have too.

There are moments of genuine humor in the novel. I really enjoyed the chat room moderated by no other than a certain "Mr. Anderson" (almost Andersen, right?) and featuring such fairy tale creatures as a princely Frog who is waiting for a kiss of deliverance, a Snow White who hates dwarves (sic!), a SilentMaid who is, in fact, a siren deeply in love with a sailor she saved one day and so on. I thought this was a really creative, innovative touch, and it made me smile to imagine these fairy tale characters tapping the keyboard of a computer, chatting with one another about their problems.

Finally the gardening classes as well as references to classic novels like The Phantom of the Opera, Les Miserables and The Hunchback of Notre Dame really endeared this book to me. The cover is very nice too - I love roses!


What I didn’t like:

If you were such an old acid-dripping hag like me you would say the same (but please, don’t do such a thing – I hate competition): the ending was oh-so-HEA-predictable and saccharine sweet; it almost spoiled the whole novel for me. One or two refreshing turns and twists would make the reading experience definitely more enjoyable. The Beast yelling the name of the Beauty standing in an open window? Should I switch the TV on?

I also didn’t like Lindy, the sweet protagonist bound to save our beastly prince. In my opinion her character lacked some depth  rather badly. To tell the truth there were moments when I wished Magda, working as a  maid and cook for Kyle, was actually his one true love. Lindy did very little to win me over - she read “Jane Eyre” and Shakespeare sonnets, she was poor but intelligent and very hard-working ( rolling my eyes), she lived with a horrible dad (a yawn) who would gladly sell her for a bag of dope without much haggling (anybody wants some tea?). Being a complete hag I prefer ass-kicking heroines who know what they want and grab it even if it is illegal (or maybe especially when it is illegal).

Finally Mr. Anderson was sorely missed when I finished – the author didn’t explain what happened to him and his Unexpected Changes chat group. Can I join? I live alone in a very high tower in the middle of a forest and I never go out; the strange thing is that my hair has started to grow like mad recently - several meters a day...

Final verdict:

YA fans and those who like re-telling of fairy tales and HEA should be overjoyed- it was a light, breezy read, charming despite some weaknesses. As I’ve always liked fairy tales I think I'll be reading more from this author.

Concise history with fangs - part two.


In the first part I presented briefly some ancient beliefs concerning vampires and werewolves - they came from Egypt, Middle East, Greece and Italy. Now let’s progress to more familiar eras and countries - those of Southern, Eastern and Northern Europe where  basic concepts and myths of vampires crystallized during Middle Ages and later periods. This second historical trip through ages and strange places will be a bit longer but I hope it will still remain interesting. The first part of my history with fangs can be found clicking here.

Part two 

From the Middle Ages to the 18th century
Misunderstood satanic beasts 

As time passed on and Christianity grew in popularity, the belief in a redemptive value of blood became common. Holy Communion, which includes drinking wine symbolizing Christ's blood and eating a wafer, symbolizing his flesh, was at times taken quite literally. Some people, confusing pagan beliefs with transubstantiation (meaning the literal presence of Christ's flesh and blood during Communion) took part in feasting on human flesh and drinking human blood. During the 11th Century, witches and doctors alike prescribed virgin blood to cure all illnesses. Also during this time, some corpses found intact all over Europe began a huge vampire scare. The belief came about that people who died without a chance to receive last rites or those who had committed suicide or had been excommunicated were destined to return to the earth as revenants. And feed on the rest of living population.

Various accounts of the discovery of vampires can be read in books such as The Diabolical Dictionary (Dictionnaire Infernal) by the Bishop of Cahors; the Courtiers Triflings (De Nugis Curialium) by Walter Map, and the History of England(Historia Rerum Anglicarum) written by William of Newburgh. The stories of William Map is in fact nothing else than a collection of anecdotes and trivia, containing court gossip and a little real history, written clearly in a satirical vein. The vampires he described arguably bear some resemblance to East European monsters so now we will move to the beautiful Slavonic and Nordic countries to meet their  vampires.

In Slavic lore, causes of vampirism were numerous, including being born with a caul, teeth or tail, being conceived on certain days. Also any "unnatural" death, excommunication, and improper burial rituals might create a vampire. Evidence that a vampire was active in a given locality included strange death cases of cattle, sheep, relatives or neighbours; an exhumed body being in a lifelike state with new growth of the fingernails or hair; a body swelled up; or blood on the mouth coupled with a ruddy complexion. 

Many Serbians believed that even having red hair could be a vampiric trait. Preventive measures included placing a crucifix in the coffin, placing blocks under the chin to prevent the body from eating the shroud, nailing clothes to coffin walls for the same reason, putting sawdust in the coffin (so that the vampire awakens in the evening and compelled to count every grain of sawdust, which occupies the entire evening, so he will die at dawn) or piercing the body with thorns or stakes. In the case of stakes, the general idea was to pierce through the vampire and into the ground below, pinning the body down. Certain people would bury those believed to be potential vampires with scythes above their necks, so the dead would decapitate themselves as they rose. Vampires, like other Slavic legendary monsters, were afraid of garlic and could be also destroyed by decapitation (the Kashubs placed the head between the body’s feet), burning, repeating the funeral 
service, sprinkling holy water on the body, or exorcism.

Members of the Nordic CouncilImage via Wikipedia

Scandinavian countries enjoyed their own vampires - the Old Norse draugr is another medieval example of an undead creature. A draugr or draug  was also known as aptrgangr (lit. "after-goer," or "one who walks after death"). The original Norse meaning of the word is "ghost", and in older literature one will find clear distinctions between sea-draug and land-draug. Water seemed to be their natural element as draugar (the plural form of "draug") were believed to live in the graves of dead Vikings, inhabiting the body of the dead. Views differ on whether the personality and soul of the dead person lingered in the draugr as well. As the graves of important men often contained a good amount of wealth, the draugr jealously guarded his treasures and if a thief came then he was his dinner (or supper).

Tales of vampiric entities were found among the ancient Romans and the Romanized inhabitants of eastern Europe, Romanians (known as Vlachs in historical context). Romanian tradition described a myriad of ways of creating a vampire - usually it meant people didn’t have the slightest idea how such a creature could be created but tried to “familiarize” themselves with the topic at hand. A person born with a caul, an extra nipple, a tail, or extra hair was doomed to become a vampire. The same fate applied to someone born too early, someone whose mother encountered a black cat crossing her path (imagine the fate of black kittens in such a community), and someone who was born out of wedlock. Others who became vampires were those who died an unnatural death or before baptism, the seventh child in any family (presuming all of his or her previous siblings were of the same sex), the child of a pregnant woman who avoided eating salt (sic!), and a person who was looked upon by a vampire or a witch. Moreover, being bitten by a vampire meant of course certain condemnation to a vampiric existence after death. 

Romanian vampires are called Strigoi, based on the ancient Greek term 'strip' for 'screech owl', which also came to mean demon or witch. There are different types of Strigoi. Live Strigoi are live witches who will become vampires after death. They have the ability to send out their souls at night to meet with other witches or with Strigoi, which are reanimated bodies that return to suck the blood of family, livestock, and neighbours. Other types of vampires in Romanian folklore include Moroi and Pricolici. 
The VampireImage via Wikipedia


To get rid of a vampire, one could hire a Dhampir (the son of a male vampire and his widow) or a Moroi to detect the vampire. To ward off vampires, Gypsies drove steel or iron needles into a corpse's heart and placed bits of steel in the mouth, over the eyes, ears and between the fingers at the time of burial. They also placed hawthorn in the corpse's sock or drove a hawthorn stake through the legs. Further measures included driving stakes into the grave, pouring boiling water over it, as well as decapitating or burning the corpse. The Varcolac, which is sometimes mentioned in Romanian folklore, was more closely related to a mythological wolf that could devour the sun and moon (similar to Skoll and Hati in Norse mythology), and hence later became connected with werewolves rather than vampires. (A person afflicted with lycanthropy could turn into a dog, pig, or wolf.) 

According to the late Serbian ethnologist Tatomir Vukanovic, Roma people in Kosovo believed that vampires were invisible to most people, but could be seen "by a twin brother and sister born on a Saturday who wear their drawers and shirts inside out." Likewise, a settlement could be protected from a vampire "by finding a twin brother and sister born on a Saturday and making them wear their shirts and drawers inside out. This pair could see the vampire out of doors at night, but immediately after it saw them it would have to flee, head over heels." 

Some believe that vampires may have the attributes of aliens thus some think they are not of Earth at all. They would rather be considered demons as the 13th century folklore may have suggested. 

The phenomenon of Vampirism continued through the Renaissance era only sporadically, but again grew to epidemic proportions in the 14th century, mainly in central European Regions of Prussia, Silesia and Bohemia (now Germany, Poland and the Czech Republic). The bubonic plague was thought to be the work of vampires (and once again it indicated that people didn’t understand neither the illness itself nor its causes so they blamed anything and everything). Panic and fear of infection led people to bury their dead without completely verifying that they were truly deceased. Small wonder so many encounters of vampires rising from their graves were reported during that time. A person buried alive would try to claw his way out of the grave and most likely would be discovered covered in blood from the wounds he had inflicted upon himself by doing so. This, of course, would label him or her as a vampire instantly and provide more scary stories to be repeated over and over again.

In the late 17th and at the beginning of the 18th century vampires originating in folklore were widely reported mainly from Eastern Europe. These tales formed the basis of the vampire legend that later entered Germany and England, where they were subsequently embellished and popularized. One of the earliest recordings of vampire activity came from the region of Istria in modern Croatia, in 1672. Local reports cited the local vampire Giure Grando of the village Khring near Tinjan as the cause of panic among the villagers. A former peasant, Guire died in 1656. However, local villagers claimed he returned from the dead and began drinking blood from the people and sexually harassing his widow. The village leader ordered a stake to be driven through his heart, but when the method failed to kill him, he was subsequently beheaded with better results.

During the 18th century, which was called the Age of Enlightenment, the belief in vampires increased
Le Vampire,engraving by R. de MoraineKilling a vampire via Wikipedia
dramatically, resulting in a mass hysteria. There was simply  a frenzy of vampire sightings in Eastern Europe, with frequent stakings and grave diggings to identify and kill the potential revenants; even government officials engaged in the hunting and staking of would-be vampires. The panic began with an outbreak of alleged vampire attacks in East Prussia in 1721 and in the Habsburg Monarchy from 1725 to 1734, which spread to other localities. Two famous vampire cases, the first to be officially recorded and investigated, involved the corpses of Peter Plogojowitz and Arnold Paole from Serbia. Plogojowitz was reported to have died at the age of 62, but allegedly returned after his death asking his son for food. When the son refused, he was found dead the following day. Plogojowitz supposedly returned and attacked some neighbours who died from loss of blood. In the second case, Paole, an ex-soldier turned farmer who allegedly was attacked by a vampire years before, died while haying. After his death, people began to die in the surrounding area and it was widely believed that Paole had returned to prey on the neighbours. 

The two incidents were well-documented: government officials examined the bodies, wrote case reports, and published books throughout Europe. The hysteria, commonly referred to as the "18th-Century Vampire Controversy", raged for a generation. The problem was exacerbated by rural epidemics of so-claimed vampire attacks, undoubtedly caused by the higher amount of superstition that was present in village communities. Although many scholars reported during this period that vampires did not exist, and attributed reports of vampire-sighting to premature burial or rabies, superstitious belief increased. In his Philosophical Dictionary, Voltaire wrote:

These vampires were corpses, who went out of their graves at night to suck the blood of the living, either at their throats or stomachs, after which they returned to their cemeteries. The persons so sucked waned, grew pale, and fell into consumption; while the sucking corpses grew fat, got rosy, and enjoyed an excellent appetite. It was in Poland, Hungary, Silesia, Moravia, Austria, and Lorraine, that the dead made this good cheer.

He was an educated philosopher, not a simple peasant, though. The controversy only ceased when Empress Maria Theresa of Austria sent her personal physician, Gerard van Swieten, to investigate the claims of vampiric entities. He concluded that vampires did not exist and the Empress passed laws prohibiting the opening of graves and desecration of bodies, sounding the end of the vampire epidemics. Despite this condemnation, the vampire lived on in artistic works and in local superstition.

Vampires were believed to be most active on the eve of two religious holidays, the Feast of St. George (Julian calendar, May 4-5 Gregorian calendar April 22-23) and the Feast of St. Andrew . (Julian calendar, November 23-24. Gregorian calendar, November 29-30). The Feast of St. George was a very important festival. Known as the Great Martyr, George was a widely-known and beloved Saint. Not only was he acknowledge as the patron of England, but many other countries as well. He was also the patron of horses, cattle, wolves, and all enemies of witches and vampires. It was on St. George's eve that vampires all the forces of evil were most exquisite. People would remain in their homes with continuous light throughout the night.They placed thorns across thresholds, painted crosses on their doors with tar, put thistles on windows, lit bonfires, and spread garlic everywhere they could. Throughout the night, prayers would be recited repeatedly and naked blades placed beneath their pillows. If the night went well without any occurrences , the saint's feast was celebrated with much exuberance that day. The thorns and garlic were then replaced by Roses and other flowers. 

The Feast of St. Andrew, accompanied with the Feast of St. George and Easter, was acknowledged as one of the most feared times of the year in Romania. St. Andrew  was the patron of wolves and donor of garlic. It was on St. Andrew's Eve, in certain parts of Romania, that the vampire was believed to be the most active and dangerous, the vampires was also believed to continue their activity throughout the winter and rest at epiphany (January). During these perilous times, it was considered wise to rub garlic on the doors and windows to protect families within the residence from any vampire attacks. Livestock was also at risk  so precautions were taken with them as well by rubbing them down with garlic. Just imagine the
Balaklava sights (2005-09-028)Image by Argenberg via Flickr
smell - if I was a vampire I would move out immediately.

In the next installment of my history I will present two prominent figures who, although certainly not affected by vampirism, became the templates for many modern vampires in popular culture. These two will be of course Vlad III, Prince of Wallachia (1431–1476), more commonly known as Vlad the Impaler or Dracula and Countess Elizabeth Báthory de Ecsed. I wanted to include their bios in this part (as they both lived in 15th century) but it proved to be impossible due to the excess of material.
 Sources:


Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, 24 February 2011

Review: Nefertiti by Michelle Moran

  • Hardcover: 480 pages
  • Publisher: Crown; 1 edition (July 10, 2007)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0307381463
  • ISBN-13: 978-0307381460
  • genre: historical fiction

I got this book in the digital form courtesy of my friend Kasiul - thanks a lot!

Synopsis:

The Eighteenth Dynasty, ancient Egypt. Nefertiti and Mutnodjmet (Mutny), two daughters of a powerful Egyptian vizier, grew up in a rural sleepy town. All this comes to a sudden halt when Nefertiti, aged just 15, is chosen to be Chief Wife of the young, hot blooded heir apparent to the Egyptian throne – Amunhotep the Younger. The prince has an obsession for Aten, a minor Egyptian god representing the Sun disc, and he hates priests of Amon, as, in his opinion, they wield too much power and are too rich. Nefertiti was chosen by her father and her aunt, the old Pharaoh's wife, just because they believe she would be able to reign in Amunhotep and temper his hand.
Pharaoh Akhenaten and his family adoring the A...Akhenaten worshipping the Aten with his family via Wikipedia

The prince has already been known for being power-hungry and ruthless. In 1351 B.C., he allegedly murdered his older brother who had had a bad chariot accident; that’s how he became next in line to Egypt's throne. Now he's 17, and he already has a wife, but Kiya's blood is not royal, and she is hardly as bewitching as Nefertiti. Things get tense when Kiya gives birth to a son and the popular Nefertiti has only daughters. When the old Pharaoh dies in mysterious circumstances the new Pharaoh decides to force Egyptians to change their old religion and worship only Aten. He even changes his name to Akhenaten. He also decides to build a new city for himself and his Chief Wife. He seems to be deaf to the pleas of his generals –  Hetits have been attacking Egyptian borders and the king is wasting money on useless statues and temples.

Meanwhile, Mutny – now being Nefertiti’s handmaiden, closest friend and the best confidante - secretly longs for a family of her own. Nefertiti and her father don’t even think of allowing her to do so. As her sister rises higher and higher, Mutny feels more and more trapped in the court full of dark intrigues and dirty politics. She falls in love with a young general but the Pharaoh doesn’t like soldiers and doesn’t trust them so she can’t marry him. Finally, a tragedy occurs and it forces Mutny to claim her independence and start her own life on her own terms. Just in time - as the royal family is making one mistake after another a revolt against them and their new god is brewing. Not to mention the plague.

What I liked:

Mutnodjmet is a very nice character – the real highlight of the novel. Her relationship with Nefertiti is beautifully depicted. There is a scene where they are both praying to the Hippopotamus goddess of fertility but they just can't seem to stop their sisterly bickering long enough to get through the prayers - it was very funny and real. I don't know if the author really intended the scene to be humorous but I found it charming and well-written. Unfortunately, overall it was one of few good scenes.

What I didn’t like:

Writing a historical novel set in a such distant period is always a risk. In most cases such a novel will contain minor (and sometimes major) distortions. The Eighteenth Dynasty, especially those years which were dominated by the "heretic" king Akhenaten and his fascinating queen, Nefertiti, is an enigmatic era in Ancient Egyptian history, filled with speculations, theories and questions that will probably never be answered by us. If your fictional narration is supposed to work you must try to present it in a believable way finding clever explanations to some of these questions. I’m afraid Ms Moran failed to come up with good theories and her only saving grace is the fact that it was her debut novel and she chose a difficult topic (but hey, who made her to do so?).

Most of the book reads as if it was written by a student. The dialogue is simplistic, main characters, especially the young Pharaoh Akhenaten (presented as a one-note shrill and over-ambitious lunatic) were annoying. The plot was hardly better - especially the climax seemed to me rather ridiculous. How anyone who has done even the slightest research into the times of the Pharaohs, (as Moran is said having done) would expect a reader to believe that the king of Egypt could be quarantined in his own palace until he dies? The Pharaoh was a living god and could not be touched, let alone be left to die in some sealed up room while everyone just looked on and waited. The death of his beloved Nefertiti was also rather abrupt and unbelievable – it looked as if the authoress has suddenly run out of time and, in order to tuck away all the odds and ends, grabbed the first idea that came to her mind. Not a very brilliant idea.
Unfinished stele depicting Nefertiti pouring w...Nefertiti, presented as a ruler (with a crown on her head) is pouring wine to her husband via Wikipedia

Also the authoress didn’t explain well why it was necessary for Akhenaten to marry Nefertiti at all. Well, let me straighten it up - in order to be crowned as the Pharaoh the heir apparent had to marry one of royal blood princesses – that’s why different princes often married their sisters or half-sisters, nieces, aunts and even daughters. Committing a horrible incest, I know, but keep in mind that these guys were thought to be living gods; they followed different laws and only the royal female bloodline could provide them with the crown. Some Egyptologists even claim that this custom was clearly the remnant of  matriarchal society. That’s why Kiya, even being the mother of a royal prince or two, couldn’t have been the Chief Wife (let alone a woman-pharaoh). On the other hand Nefertiti qualified not because she was daughter of a Mittian princess (as it was stressed out in the book several times) but mainly because her aunt was the Queen of Egypt so she belonged to the royal bloodline and apparently Akhenaton had no sisters or other female relatives closer than her. That’s why the fact that Nefertiti from the novel is so anxious to have a son is beyond credibility – it is not an European queen, her daughters were more than enough as anybody who wanted the double crown of Egypt would have to marry one of them anyway.

But the biggest leap of logic this book in my opinion takes is to blame the downfall of Akhenaten's city, Amarna, and his new religion on the Black Plague. I truly did a double take reading this. Now it's not impossible that the plague existed back then, but this is the first time I've heard of it. Most Egyptologists assume that the unpopular Akehnaten was overthrown by a public revolt, which seems the most likely theory to me.

Final verdict:

Fortunately this book came free to me via one of my Internet friends. It is perhaps a decent read as far as a romance goes, but if you know anything at all about Egyptology steer clear of it - IMHO it is a total waste of papyrus.




Bust of queen Nefertiti in the Altes Museum, B...Isn't she lovely? Image via Wikipedia




Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, 23 February 2011

Wishful Wednesday, 23 February

The meme is hosted by Brooke Bluestocking Guide.



 Welcome to Wishful Wednesday! 
This week I wish for an unusual story: "Because I am Furniture" by Thalia Chaltas

 Product description from Amazon.com:

"Anke’s father is abusive to her brother and sister. But not to her. Because, to him, she is like furniture— not even worthy of the worst kind of attention. Then Anke makes the school volleyball team. She loves feeling her muscles after workouts, an ache that reminds her she is real. Even more, Anke loves the confidence that she gets from the sport. And as she learns to call for the ball on the court, she finds a voice she never knew she had. For the first time, Anke is making herself seen and heard, working toward the day she will be able to speak up loud enough to rescue everyone at home— including herself."

Tuesday, 22 February 2011

Review: My Soul to Take by Rachel Vincent (Soul Screamers 01)

  • Reading level: Young Adult
  • Paperback: 384 pages
  • Publisher: Harlequin Teen; Original edition (August 1, 2009)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0373210035
  • ISBN-13: 978-0373210039
  • genre Paranormal romance

Synopsis:

Kaylee Cavanaugh lives with her aunt, uncle and a younger cousin Sophie. All in all she seems to be a pretty ordinary junior student although in her past a tragedy occurred – her mother died in an accident when she was three and her father hasn’t been interested in her life very much ever since. One day she and her best friend Emma sneak into a club to have some fun. While they are dancing and picking up guys, Kaylee sees a dark shadow surrounding one of the girls. She has a death premonition about that girl and wants to scream very badly. She doesn't fall to pieces only because a handsome boy called Nash Hudson helps her. Nash is a popular athlete from Kaylee's school, and his behaviour was really sweet and understanding – he held her hand and sang quietly until she no longer felt the need to scream her head off. He's so accepting of her unusual behavior that it makes her wonder if he has ulterior motives in getting close to her (like meeting her super-hot cheerleading cousin again).

Next day Kaylee finds out on the news that the girl she noticed in the club died and nobody knows why. That girl becomes the first of several teenage girls in the area to drop dead just like that, for no identifiable reason. Kaylee knows her screams have some connection to these deaths. Soon enough it also becomes clear that Nash knows much more than he's saying; apart from that she finds that her foster family is keeping a truckload of secrets from her. Kaylee thinks she's losing her mind or has a brain cancer but the truth is quite different - she's not a human but a bean sidhe, or banshee. She has a lot to learn. Will she learn quickly enough to prevent other deaths? Will Nash be still willing to help her? Will her aunt and uncle reveal some family secrets? Or maybe they will send her to a mental health specialist again?


What I liked:

I grant you – a YA paranormal novel with banshees and other mysterious Netherworld creatures instead of vampires and werewolves is really something original. Such a new rendering of a very neglected corner of Celtic folklore I found very original and refreshing.

Side characters like Kaylee's Uncle Brendon, his health-obsessed wife and stuck-up social butterfly of a cousin are well-rounded and believable. However the real star is Todd – he speaks with a voice of his own and you do want to know more about him and his unusual profession (he is a reaper; in fact one of Grim Reapers). I only hope he will be given more space in next installments – he clearly deserves that.

Finally the authoress has a noticeably different style of writing – rather simple but compelling. I read this book in one day and it was done without breaking a sweat. The plot unfolded at a nice pace, just enough to keep you hooked and there were no tiresome repetitions of words or phrases just to show we are dealing with teenagers (at least I didn’t register anything very annoying).

What I didn’t like:

I don't understand how teens in this kind of books can fall so deep in love in a few hours and be sure they are made for each other and they must stay together no matter what. Kaylee and Nash's relationship was a bit skewed - she becomes clingy and needy so quickly and is always looking to him before she speaks. She even asks permission to speak on several occasions. Perhaps it is the whole bean sidhe thing.

By the way there are male and female bean sidhes in this book and the division of their roles got to me a bit. Female bean sidhes are uncontrollable, almost hysterical screamers who can keep a soul stuck for a while in the same place and say goodbye; male bean sidhes have Influence (it's capitalized like that), which they use to calm the aforementioned hysterical females. And only males can direct the souls of deceased to a chosen place. Hmmm…Of course both male and female bean sidhes are the best when they work in a well-orchestrated tandem but still isn’t it a tiny bit sexist? I mean I would like the females being given more control over their gift.

The whole predestination theory with departed souls, planned deaths and living on borrowed time didn’t manage to persuade me. No way. Especially that it was clearly shown that even a reaper can cheat and be cheated. Where’s the logic in it? I also didn’t buy the final explanation of those mysterious deaths of young girls – it was unexpected, that’s true, but after a moment or two just unbelievable.

Final verdict:

Not too bad, taking into account the fact that it is definitely not my favourite genre - a light, enjoyable read but in need of a gender role overhaul and maybe a better baddie. I heard the second part gets better so I might be tempted if I have time.
Three Celtic goddesses, as depicted at Coventi...Image via Wikipedia


Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, 21 February 2011

Concise history with fangs - part one.

You must admit it - nowadays vampires and werewolves are practically everywhere. Books, movies, shops, pop culture, you name it. When it comes to books, though, I’ve noticed that many (really too many) authors don’t even bother with “when” and “what” – in short it seems they don’t try to find out (let alone present in their books) any historical background of these mythical creatures (of course there are also those who do their homework properly and believe it or not, it makes a world of difference to me, a humble reader). Pure imagination is good but I really wonder why some of them have adapted such a negligent stance. After all this is an interesting topic and research has never been easier than today – all you have to do is to sit in your room before your laptop or your PC and read and you might find plenty of food for your thoughts. Too simple? Ok, let’s make it even simpler then. Today I am starting my concise history with fangs. Its aim will be to show that vampires (and also werewolves) weren’t born yesterday and haven’t been created by either Stephanie Meyer or even Bram Stoker. They are truly ancient and fascinating. I hope you will enjoy this one - let's go on a historical trip through ages and continents!


Part one

Antiquity - godesses and monsters

Sumerian Terracotta relief, Lilith, 1950 BCE. ...Summerian terracota relief showing a blood-drinking monster with owls via Wikipedia
When did vampires begin? It seems as early as any human civilization, probably even earlier. The exact date of origin is unknown; but evidence of the vampire-related tales can be found in many places. For example in ancient Persia a vase was discovered depicting a man struggling with a huge creature which is trying to suck his blood. Similar evidence was found with the ancient Chaldeans in Mesopotamia, near the Tigris and the Euphrates rivers, and with Assyrian and Summerian writings on clay or stone tablets. The land of the Chaldeans is also called the "Ur of the Chaldeans," which was the original home of Abraham from the Bible. Here we meet the first real thing.

"Lilith" was a possible vampiric monster from the ancient Hebrew Bible and its later interpretations - old Hebrew texts removed from the Old Testament, known as Apocrypha. Although she is described in the book of Isaiah, her roots are more likely in Babylonian demonology . Lilith was a monster who roamed at night taking on the appearance of an owl. She would hunt, seeking to kill the weakest - newborn children and pregnant women. According to Jewish tradition Lilith was the wife of Adam before there was Adam and Eve, but she was demonized because she refused to obey Adam. One version of the story says that she left her husband due to his sexual ineptitude, becoming the Queen of Demons and Evil spirits. In modern terms and from a more liberated viewpoint, she demanded equal rights becoming almost a first feminist. Naturally, she was considered evil for such "radical" desires and became a vampire who eventually attacked the children of Adam and Eve - all their human descendants. Because Hebrew law absolutely forbade the eating of human flesh or the drinking of any type of blood, Lilith's blood drinking was described as exceptionally evil. To ward off attacks from Lilith, parents used to hang amulets from their child's cradle - this is in a way continued up to now, with different rattles adorning pushchairs and prams.
Lilith (1892) by John Collier in Southport Atk...Lilith with a snake by John Collier via Wikipedia


In the medieval text Alphabet of Ben Sira the story of Lilith is finished this way:


“Whenever I see you or your names or your forms in an amulet, I will have no power over that infant.' She also agreed to have one hundred of her children die every day. Accordingly, every day one hundred demons perish, and for the same reason, we write the angels' names on the amulets of young children. When Lilith sees their names, she remembers her oath, and the child recovers.”


The Ancient Egyptian goddess Sekhmet in one myth became full of bloodlust after slaughtering humans and was only sated after drinking alcohol colored as blood (other gods didn’t want her to kill all the humans so they decided to get her drunk and finish the folly). Still she was a goddess.

It was continued in the European civilizations - ancient Greece and Rome. There were numerous bloodthirsty Goddesses in both Roman and Greek mythology, known as Lamiae, Empusae and Striges. These names eventually evolved into the general terms for Witches, Demons and Vampires. The Vampires, though they did drink blood, were in fact goddesses not "living Dead" or “undead” people - disembodied divinities capable of taking on human appearances so that they might seduce their victims.

The ancient Greeks believed in the strigoe or lamiae, who were monsters who ate children and drank their blood. The first Lamia, (Greek: Λάμια) was human, though - the beautiful queen of Libya and the lover of Zeus, the Greek king of all gods; Zeus's wife, Hera, fought against her (Hera, being one seriously jealous wife, fought most of her husband’s lovers whenever she could find them as she could do nothing to her philandering husband). Lamia was driven insane, and she killed her own offspring. Then she was turned into a monster - half woman, half serpent. At night, it was said, she hunted other human children to kill as well. Myths variously describe Lamia's monstrous  appearance as a result of either Hera's wrath, the pain of grief, the madness that drove her to murder, or - in some rare versions - a natural result of being Hecate's daugter. Nothing is known about the creation of other Lamias or how they propagated. Apparently the name “Lamia” was popular among Greek courtesans (heteras).

Other tale, known by both the Greeks and Romans, concerns the wedding of a young man named Menippus. At the wedding a guest, who was a noted philosopher called Apollonius of Tyana, carefully observed the bride, who was said to be very beautiful but somehow strange. Apollonius finally accused the wife of being a vampire, and according to the story (as it was later told by a scholar named Philostratus in the first century A.D.) the wife confessed to vampirism. Allegedly she was planning to marry Menippus merely to have him handy as a source of fresh blood to drink. Talk about ultimate exploitation of a husband. Here we deal with the first myth about a human vampire.

Roman’s vampires were called Strix and apparently, were borrowed from the Greeks with one difference - they were male. The earliest recorded tale of the strix is from the lost Ornithologia of the Greek author Boios, which is partially preserved in Antoninus Liberalis's Metamorphoses. This tells the story of Polyphonte and her two sons Agrios and Oreios (their father being a wild bear), who were punished for their cannibalism, by being transformed into wild animals. Polyphonte became a strix (so an owl) "that cries by night, without food or drink, with head below and tips of feet above, a harbinger of war and civil strife to men”. Ovid tells the story of striges attacking the legendary king Procas in his cradle, and how they were warded off with arbutus (small trees or shrubs with red flaking bark and edible red berries) and placated with the meat of pigs, as an explanation for the custom of eating beans and bacon on the Kalends of June.

Romans and Greeks were also the first to write something about werewolves, monsters like vampires but able to change their shape. Herodotus in his Histories wrote that the Neuri, a tribe he places to the north-east of Scythia, were all transformed into wolves once every year for several days, and then changed back. In Greek mythology, the story of Lycaon provides one of the earliest examples of a werewolf legend. According to one version, Lycaon was transformed into a wolf as a result of eating human flesh; one of those who were present at periodical sacrifice on Mount Lycæon was said to suffer a similar fate.In Metamorphoses, the Roman poet Ovid described stories of men who roamed the woods of Arcadia in the form of wolves. The Roman scholar Pliny the Elder, relates two tales of lycanthropy. Quoting Euanthes he mentions a man who hung his clothes on an ash tree and swam across an Arcadian lake, transforming him into a wolf. On the condition that he attacked no human being for nine years, he would be free to swim back across the lake to resume human form. Pliny also quotes Agriopas regarding a tale of a man who was turned into a wolf after tasting the entrails of a human child.

More legends about vampires continued throughout all the world, including India, Malaysia, Polynesia and the lands of the Aztecs and Eskimos but, as it is a concise version of history, I won't repeat here every single one of them, just a few which seemed more original than the others.

According to the Aztecs, the offering of a young victims blood to the Gods ensured the fertilization of the earth. In India, tales of vetalas, ghoul-like beings that inhabit corpses, are found in old Sanskrit folklore. A prominent story tells of King Vikramaditya and his nightly quests to capture an elusive vetala. The vetala legends have been compiled in the book Baital Pachisi. The vetala is an undead creature, who like the bat associated with modern day vampirism, hangs upside down on trees found in cremation grounds and cemeteries. In ancient Nepal vampires may have existed as well - at least in legend. Some very old paintings (as old as 3000 B.C.) on the walls of caves depict blood drinking creatures; the Nepalese "Lord of Death" is shown holding a blood-filled goblet in the form of a human skull standing in a pool of blood. The most famous Indian deity associated with drinking blood is Kali, who has fangs, wears a garland of corpses or skulls and has four arms (picture above). Her temples are located near cremation grounds. She and the goddess Durga battled the demon Raktabija who could reproduce himself from each drop of blood spilled. Kali drank all his blood so none was spilled, thereby winning the battle and killing him. The hopping corpse is an equivalent of the vampire in Chinese tradition; however, it consumes the victim's life essence (chi or qi) rather than blood and it is called kiang shi.

I hope the first part wasn't too long; in the next one I will try to describe the development of stories about vampires and werewolves  from the Middle Ages to 18th century.

Sources:


Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, 20 February 2011

Reviewing a classic: Princesse de Clèves by Marie de la Fayette

About the author:
Madame de La FayetteImage via Wikipedia


Marie Madeleine Pioche de la Vergne was born and raised in Paris, to members of the minor nobility. Her father died when Marie was 15, and in the following year her mother married a member of the Sevigne family, which brought Marie a connection to Madame de Sevigne, who would become her closest friend. Marie Madeleine became an attendant to the queen, Anne of Austria, and began the study of classical literature and modern languages.

At 20, Marie Madeleine was married to Francois Motier, Comte de La Fayette, of Auvergne, a widower 18 years older; the couple had two sons. For about five years, Madame de la Fayette lived part of the time in Auvergne and part in Paris but by the end of 1660 she was already living permanently in Paris, while her husband remained in Auvergne. There was no formal separation - her husband even visited occasionally and signed papers allowing her to control her own finances. However, she began the friendship with the Duc de la Rochefoucauld, which would last until his death. All was done so discreetly that there was no gossip, even in a small society that relished romantic rumours so much.

During the 1670's La Fayette and La Rouchefoucauld, both in failing health, appear to have worked together on La Princesse de Clèves The novel was published anonymously in 1678, and although La Fayette denied authorship for both herself and La Rouchefoucauld, their closest friends believed it to have been their collaborative effort. An immense success, the work is often taken to be the first true French novel and the first attempt at analyzing psychological nature of the main character (and other characters as well).

Synopsis:
Title page of Marie-Madeleine de la Fayette's ...Image via Wikipedia

Mademoiselle de Chartres is a high-born, beautiful but a bit sheltered heiress, aged 15. Her mother has brought her to the court of Henri II (a disguised version of the court of Louis XIV) to seek a husband with good financial and social prospects. Old jealousies against a kinsman spark intrigues against the young girl and, as a result, the best marriage candidates suddenly withdraw. Poor Mademoiselle and her maman are devastated – the girl decides to accept a middling suitor, the Prince de Clèves. He at least is being smitten with her. Mademoiselle doesn’t love him, however. After her marriage, she meets the dashing Duc de Nemours, described as "nature's masterpiece" and "the most handsome and the most nobly built man in the world" and the two fall in love at first sight during a dance. Still they do nothing to pursue their affections, limiting their contact, comme il fault, to an occasional visit in the now-Princess of Clèves's salon. It doesn't mean their passion is lukewarm, quite the contrary in fact.

The Duc becomes involved in a scandal at court. It leads the Princess to believe that he has been unfaithful in his affections. A letter from a spurned mistress to her paramour is discovered in the dressing room at one of the estates. The letter is actually to the Princess' uncle, the Vidame de Chartres, who has also become entangled in a relationship with the Queen. The Vidame begs the Duc de Nemours to claim ownership of the letter, which ends up in the Princess' possession. The Duc has to produce documents from the Vidame to convince the Princess that his heart has been true - he manages to do it, finally receiving the proof that the lady loves him back. It seems that the happiness is just a few days away.

Mme de Clèves indeed feels more and more inclined, against her strict code of honour, to cheat on her husband with the Duc. In her bewildered attempt to free herself from M. de Nemours' hypnotic spell, she even does the unthinkable - she confesses to her husband that she has fallen in love with another man (without at first naming M. de Nemours, but the husband eventually identified him anyway). M. de Clèves, falls ill and later dies of jealousy (or rather of a broken heart as he truly loved his wife). On his deathbed, he blames the Duc for his illness and begs his wife not to marry him.
Portrait de Jacques de Savoie, duc de Nemours....Portrait of the Duc the Nemours (yes, he was real and hansome) via Wikipedia

The Princess is now footloose and fancy free (at least officially) as a young widow but deep down she remains torn between her duty and her love. The Duc pursues her more openly now as she is “up for grabs” again. What will she do – follow the advice of her dearly loved (but now dead) mother and the plea of her late husband or pursue her own passion? I decided not to spoil you this time (although it is a classic novel so you can find the end of the story without any problems anywhere).

What I liked:

I must admit this novel recreates the era of Henry II with remarkable precision – every historical romance writer should follow this example. Nearly every character – except the heroine – is a historical figure. Events and intrigues are unfold with great faithfulness to documentary record.

I also loved the intricacy of the story, the attention to detail, and how relevant the plot is to today's woman struggling to balance duty and personal identity. Although our Princess (we never get to know her name - too close to home?) neither wields a sword nor fights monsters, kicking their backsides now and then, her inner struggle is noneless epic and she certainly doesn't lack backbone. In fact sometimes I wished she had a bit less of that backbone - for her own good. Apart from that I was especially pleased how a magnificent contrast between the shallow, self-seeking motives of the majority of the royal circle and the unselfish delicacy of the lovers was presented – truly some contemporary romance writers would need to take a leaf out of Mme de la Fayette’s book.

Finally, I liked the Henri II & Diane de Poitiers romance very much, some of which plays in the background of the Princess of Cleves' story.
Diane de Poitiers (that's how I imagine our Princess might look like)

What I didn’t like:

Well, to put it shortly if you dislike unhappy endings don't read this one. The ending wasn’t illogical or silly, quite the contrary, but a bit over the top for any contemporary reader – the heroine was so driven by  her virtue and proper behavior that she appeared to me simply foolish from time to time. I also must mention that the book starts out in a rather confusing way, describing too many people and their relationships and alliances at once. If you like the historical background you will find it still ok; if you don’t, you can always skip a paragraph or two.

Final verdict:

One of these rare romance novels which stay with you after you have finished reading and make you think. I really enjoyed this book, and I'm sure I'll read it again one day.

A teaser:

“I adore you, I hate you, I offend you, I beg your forgiveness; I am filled with wonder and admiration for you, and with shame at these feelings. In brief, there is no longer tranquility or reason in me.”

Coats of Arms of the Dukes of Savoy after Henr...Image via Wikipedia

Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, 19 February 2011

Thursday, 17 February 2011

Review: Graceling by Kristin Cashore

Reading level: Young Adult
Hardcover: 471 pages
GracelingImage via Wikipedia
Publisher: Harcourt Children's Books (October 1, 2008)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 015206396X
ISBN-13: 978-0152063962
genre: fantasy, adventure

Synopsis:

Katsa, a princess living in a fatansy kingdom, is a Graceling - someone given a particular supernatural gift at birth. Such people are distinguished by her different-colored eyes and can be gifted any skill – from dancing and cooking to sword-fighting and mind-reading. If your Grace is useful a king might invite you to stay at his court and serve him. If you are not invited you become an outcast and a freak.

Katsa’s Grace is a rare one; people around her think she is Graced with killing. Even as a child she has been deadly - she has been able to kill a man with her bare hands since she was eight. This ability has left her isolated from much of society but also secured her place at her uncle's court. She has been used as a crude weapon by  king Randa who usually sends her to twist the arms (or even execute) of those who cross him. People are afraid of her, they start calling her a monster. She is lonely.

As Katsa grows up she is becoming less than happy with this arrangement. She’d rather not hurt everyone, and she’d rather not be her uncle’s dangerous lapdog. Guilt ridden by the pain that she has caused she forms a secret Council to do good work, but that is insufficient. When she meets Prince Po, looking for his kidnapped grandfather, her thoughts turn in new directions, and she has some choices to make. Katsa has no hint of how her life is about to change. She never expects to become Po’s friend. She never expects to learn a new truth about her own Grace — or about a terrible secret that lies hidden far away but might influence her very existence.

What I liked:

This is a character-driven novel so small wonder characters are original - you hardly ever meet a princess-cum-hangman in other fantasy novels. I loved the idea of graces - the eye thing was neat, too. I liked  Bitterblue, even if she was way too unrealistic to sound like a normal child. Prince Po, despite his laughable name, was a decent guy. There were some nice twists in the novel too. I never saw the demise of the bad guy coming the way it did.

What I didn’t like:

To be totally honest and not  to put too fine a point on it the world building sucks in this one. The names of five out of seven kingdoms are thinly disguised versions of North, South, East, West, and Middle. What’s more, if a king’s name is Ror, his kingdom’s capital is called…Ror City. Another king is called Leck and his capital is called…Leck City. And so on. King Randa, Katsa’s weak and bullying uncle? You guessed it right – he lives in Randa City. Every time I read these names all the fictional magic reality faded to a weak spark. What’s the point of writing a fantasy book if you can’t invent/find some good names for places and people? Prince PO, my goodness… is the boy supposed to be a badly-behaved Pekingese? Not the nickname I would have given a Prince (even if it was explained in a logical way).

Apart from that this book could have used a better editing job – you can figure out the mystery about 1/2 way through. The climax was somehow written in such a way that it became an anti-climax for me. The ending seemed to flop pretty hardcore. Another example: readers are introduced to a slew of characters that I also had no idea until much later who the hell they were. Couldn’t it be done in a more sensible way?  The villain, king Leck, appeared too few times to become a fully-fledged evil character which might be interesting enough to hate and it is a pity because he had a potential for a big nasty baddie.

Last but not least: there are some underage sex scenes in this book and I am sure some people wouldn’t feel comfortable with this subject matter in a YA novel. The whole "romance" left me confused. Katsa is against the very idea of  marriage and children but her verbal agreeing of having no strings attached sex completely clashed with what was written during the act itself. Here is why I am not buying the casual sex bit in this book: no strings attached sex does not end in tears on the girl in question’s part ( she was the one who wanted to keep it casual) and certainly does not cause feelings of distress upon imagining your “casual sex partner” leaving you, in this case Katsa imagining her life without Po and feeling totally miserable because of her vision. One brighter spot: I must commend Cashore for having Katsa on birth control (the plants she chewed on). A very reasonable move.

Final verdict:

I am afraid the story left me somewhat unsatisfied. Although Graceling was a quick read for such a hefty novel and there is a lot of potential between the 7 kingdoms and the Graced I am not sure I would like to get its sequel.
I only hope the authoress will improve (it was her debut novel).
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, 15 February 2011

All glitter? A vampire? Nah, it must be made of Swarovski crystal (+ a giveaway)

 Have you ever admired beautiful (but a bit expensive) earrings, necklaces, pendants and rings with multi-coloured crystals which brilliance is comparable to that of a diamond? If yes you are undoubtedly familiar with the brand name of Swarovski and you recognize that characteristic swan logo.





The company manufactures crystal jewelry stones, crystal gifts and objects--including its famed collection of miniature animals--and accessories, as well as crystal-based materials for the fashion industry, and components for crystal chandeliers. Swarovski is also well-known for its Swarovski Optik subsidiary's line of high-performance telescopes, gun-sites, and binoculars for hunters and birdwatching enthusiasts.
It all started in 1895 when Daniel Swarovski established his crystal cutting company. As a young man Daniel apprenticed within his father's own Bohemian glass foundry. Bohemia at that time was renowned throughout Europe and America for its particular style of crystal glass making; crystal objects, produced there were perhaps not of the best quality but definitely cheaper than those from the famous Italian Murano island near Venice. Daniel Swarovski came up with the idea of cutting glass with an electric powered tool and improving its quality. By 1892 he had produced a workable prototype machine and decided to patent his invention. So effective was this machine in cutting and creating precision and multifaceted crystal glass, that he proceeded to set up his own company with some other financiers, Franz Weis and Armand Kosman. 
Bohemian glassesBohemian glasses - image by titanium22 via Flickr

Now let me explain shortly what crystal glass really consists of and why it is different than normal glass. Technically, the term crystal is not applied to glass, as glass, by definition, lacks a crystalline structure. The use of the term lead crystal remains popular for historical and commercial reasons, and originally stems from the Venetian use of the word cristallo to describe the rock crystal imitated by Murano glassmakers. Lead oxide added to the molten glass gives lead crystal a much higher index of refraction than normal glass, and consequently much greater "sparkle". Ordinary glass has a refractive index of n = 1.5; the addition of lead produces an index of refraction of up to 1.7. To put is shortly lead glass, although not exactly good for your health, is desirable owing to its decorative properties.

 For centuries, if you wanted to produce glass you had to have a lot of wood close at hand. Wood meant cheap energy. That’s why it had long been the habit for Bohemian glass foundries to be somewhat nomadic, needing to uproot their complete factory, with workers and families, and move to new forest lands, which would provide fuel for their furnaces for another decade or more. So, and after careful consideration, it was not too surprising that Swarovski and his new partners, Kosman and Franz Weis, decided to set up the new company in a new country far away from glass manufacturing competitors. Wattens in the Austrian Alps, not far from Innsbruck, was the chosen site. The choice was based on the fact that there was the recently created hydro-electricity plant within the vicinity, which provided cheap electrical energy without the need of clearing a forest.
Set jewellery 19cImage by Kotomicreations via Flickr

Swarovski's invention produced crystal gemstones of outstanding quality--and the patented process enabled the company to become the world's leading producer of crystals. In the late 19th Century, crystal was regularly used to enhance formal evening wear. Crystal pieces were actually sewn into formal jackets and gowns. Swarovski took advantage of this fashion trend and in 1913, he created his own crystals exclusively for the fashion industry.

Always the entrepreneur, Swarovski used the shortage of cutting machines and materials during World War I to enhance his business. For the war effort, Swarovski produced grinding and dressing tools that were used to process crystal stones and he marketed them under the name of Tyrolit from 1917 to 1919. Until about 1956, Swarovski would often use the innovations of his original crystal company by developing subsidiary companies which provided products for automotive and roadway reflectors, telescopes, and lenses. 

The 1930s saw several significant developments. The first of these was a line of crystal 'trimmings,' which debuted in 1931. The Swarovski trimmings featured the company's crystal gemstones prepared in a variety of ready-to-use formats for edging, hems, and borders. Also known as rhinestones, Swarovski's gemstones were of such high quality that they were often mistaken for real diamonds. 

In the 1930s, also, Wilhelm Swarovski, one of three sons of Daniel Swarovski, began work on a prototype for a pair of field binoculars. Apparently he had inherited his father's inventiveness, had joined the family company at the age of 17, and had long been conducting experiments in glass smelting techniques. Wilhelm Swarovski finished his prototype field glasses in 1935, developing new grinding techniques for the field glasses' hand-ground and polished optical components. The company's field glasses were to remain in the prototype stage, however, until after the war ended. 
beads be meBicone crystals via Wikipedia


Though the Great Depression of the early 1930s, and then also the Second World War reduced the demand for Swarovski glass, they were not altogether forgotten. However it took a new generation and the Aurora Borealis designs in the mid-1950s to reaffirm their reputation and innovation. This line of jewellery was the creation of the grandson, Manfred Swarovski, and possessed a dreamlike sparkle of rainbow colors created by a trace metal coating. The process was brought to perfection with input from Christian Dior, the famous French fashion designer. 

The 1970s marked the beginning of a new era for Swarovski. Until then, the company had never ventured into the consumer retail market. The worldwide recession of the decade, the result of the Arab Oil Embargo of 1973, had caused a dramatic drop in demand for the company's crystal gemstones. Manfred Swarovski was searching for a way to prop up the company's sales. As granddaughter, and future company Vice-President Nadja Swarovski told the Financial Times: My grandfather was fiddling around in his office with a few little crystals when it occurred to him that the pieces, arranged in a certain fashion, resembled a tiny mouse. That was his light bulb moment.' 

The first crystal collectible sold by Swarovski was a mouse figurine. The mouse, a best seller at the Innsbruck Olympic Games, enjoyed prominence throughout the world. In the early 1990s, exhibitions featured Swarovski crystal and its crystal technology. In 1995, the company celebrated its 100th anniversary with the production of a prominent Swarovski century swan in silver crystal. In that same year, the firm opened its exhibition center featuring a history of crystal and the Swarovski company. It is really worth visiting if you ever go to Austria.

Crystallized™ - Swarovski Elements is the new brand for the company's core products ~ loose, flawlessly cut crystal components.


Sources:
http://www.fundinguniverse.com/company-histories/Swarovski-International-Holding-AG-Company-History.html
http://www.jewelrymaking-beads-library.com/swarovski-002.html
http://www.drloriv.com/appraisals/swarovski.asp
http://www.thehistoryof.net/history-of-swarovski-crystal-glass.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lead_glass

MY FIRST SPRING GIVEAWAY

I decided to organize my first giveaway on this blog! In my free time I amuse myself with creating jewellery and I have designed for you all a pair of pierced earrings with one Swarovski pearl and one Swarovski bicone crystal each. As the spring is coming the pearl is daffodil-coloured and the colour of the crystal is described as “golden shadow” (on your monitor colours might look a bit different than in reality). They are ca. 4 cm (1.6 in) long – perfect for any occasion! The photo of the earrings can be found on the black hole page, linked here.



How to enter the giveaway?
It's easy.

You can win the earrings as long as you leave a comment below. In the comment you must include your contact e-mail address. One more thing -  you should be among the followers of this blog. As simple as that. The giveaway will be open for 13 days (so from 15 February to 1 March) and then the happy winner will be announced.
I ship internationally!
Good luck!
Enhanced by Zemanta