Screenplay: Kim Fupz Aakeson
Cast:
Suzan: Eva Green
Michael: Ewan McGregor
Susan, an
epidemiologist, is getting over a broken heart when a new kind of epidemics
strikes out right where she lives and works, in Scotland. It starts with a
truck driver who suddenly has lost his sense of smell. The doctors don’t know
when, why or how he got infected (if he got infected at all). Soon the news
about people losing their sense of smell come from different countries around
the world; the strange disease (?) is affecting everyone, no matter their skin colour,
sex, age or living conditions. Nobody knows whether it is a virus, a toxin or a
strange bacteria and how it propagates.
Meantime
Susan meets Michael, a chef working in a restaurant near her flat. At first she is
pretty sure Michael is not the right man for her and let’s face it, everything indicates she is
perfectly right – Michael, a handsome but ruthless womanizer, is a fan of
one-night or rather one-two hours stands.
He kicks his girlfriends out as soon as he finishes having sex with them
claiming that he can’t sleep well with somebody else sharing his bed (sic! Have
you heard a lamer excuse?) Still Susan decides to date him (yes, he managed to
stay with her the whole night – in his case it is tantamount to a serious
commitment). However soon enough she, her new boyfriend and his colleagues lose
the sense of smell as well.
After a while they lose the sense of taste –
something disastrous if you cook professionally, small wonder Michael and his
boss are devastated. Fortunately plenty of other people can’t either smell or taste
anything any longer so the cooks focus on appearance and texture of food and
the restaurant stays open. However it becomes obvious the disease is
unstoppable and people will sooner or later lose all their remaining senses –
the doctors don’t know how to prevent that. Susan and Michael take it in their
stride and try to make the best use of the short time that is left. Still, is
it true love or just taking the easiest way out with the person who is your
best alternative at the moment?
My
impressions:
Another
low-budget film which was really better and scarier than one of these Hollywood
super-productions I’ve seen lately. It proves you don’t need fancy special
effects, digital monsters and a lot of bloody scenes to create an atmosphere of
danger. Losing your senses was horrible enough without any alien invasion but
there were some funny moments to make the glumness more bearable – for example
Susan and Michael were sitting in a bathtub eating…soap. Yes, it was after they
lost their sense of taste ;) Overall it was an emotionally intelligent movie
which doesn’t mean especially clever. Yes, I have some complaints. Melodramas
don’t agree with my stomach I suppose, or maybe I simply can’t relax enough to
stop overthinking the entertainment?
First of
all I couldn’t believe the people, once
the initial shock was over, gave up on their senses so quickly. Loss of smell?
No problem, most of scents are not so pleasant to start with and you won’t get
ruined again buying that bottle of overpriced French perfume. Loss of taste? Oh
well, there are different methods of enjoying your food if you actually need to
enjoy it at all…Loss of hearing? Well, there’s still the tv and the sign
language available so let’s go and look at those pretty pictures in comfortable
peace and quiet…I mean would you be reconciled with the loss of any of your
senses so easily? I most certainly wouldn’t. Perhaps the intention of the
director was to show that humankind is flexible to the extreme and will adopt
nicely in almost any circumstances but I found it a bit too smooth and too
quick to be believable.
Secondly I
waited and waited and didn’t see any reaction from the government or those
super-rich and privileged who wouldn’t want to have anything in common with any
disease at all. Their relatives, friends, coworkers and employees are dying and
suddenly there is one big void. Have they immigrated to Mars or something? Have
they been infected like the rest of commoners but died off more quickly due to
lower resistance? How come nobody tried to put some pressure on Susan and her
colleagues to work harder/faster/more efficiently? A weird situation, don’t you
think?
My last
complaint concerns the female lead, Susan. As an epidemiologist living in times
of a global crisis and facing probably the biggest challenge of her
professional life, she simply had way too much free time in hand. I might be
wrong but I suppose she should have
been working 24/7 along with her colleagues, with short potty breaks only, to
find out more about that strange disease and to stop it at all costs. Actually
I could imagine her sleeping on the floor of her laboratory and spending
endless hours on the Internet, consulting live with scientists and doctors from
other countries. All the humankind is on the brink of a major disaster, right? And
what is she doing? Instead of working her skinny bottom off our lovely heroine
enjoys her private life as if nothing untoward was happening around her – she goes
on a romantic stroll, she admires buskers, she dances with her beloved Michael
in a club for most of the night, she eats out and so on. Holiday in Paris,
sponsored by a rich uncle - that’s how it looked like. Apocalypse? What
apocalypse? Oh, losing your senses…right… honey, let’s jump to bed, drink some
champagne and smoke ciggies till we can.
All the
snark aside, it seems she’s surrendered so easily, assuming too quickly nothing
can be done and just passively waiting
for the next stage of the disease. A very strange attitude for a scientist
especially as she knows NOTHING, literally nothing, about her illness. Once
again would you be able to enjoy your life (or what is left of it) in such a
situation, without some nagging pangs of conscience that you, as a specialist,
could have tried harder to prevent the worst? I understand the director wanted
to show how Susan’s and Michael’s character evolved when influenced by a major
crisis but I think he forgot that survival is mostly about hard work under
pressure and the courage of pushing your boundaries, not about drifting
passively while waiting for your death. By the way, we are never shown
scientists at work in this movie, not really - feeding and hugging bunnies
can’t substitute scientific research.
Final
verdict:
If you are
willing to suspend your disbelief a bit and follow just the romantic thread
this movie can certainly keep you interested and entertained; still it keeps
asking some existential questions like what sense you really need to survive or
what is really important in your life. Just don’t expect any straightforward answers
and sometimes any logic at all. My final remark: I don’t get the title. Perfect
Sense? What sense? There’s no such thing – neither in this film nor in real life.


No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for stopping by - I always appreciate if you share your thoughts!
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.