Monday, 21 February 2011

Concise history with fangs - part one.

You must admit it - nowadays vampires and werewolves are practically everywhere. Books, movies, shops, pop culture, you name it. When it comes to books, though, I’ve noticed that many (really too many) authors don’t even bother with “when” and “what” – in short it seems they don’t try to find out (let alone present in their books) any historical background of these mythical creatures (of course there are also those who do their homework properly and believe it or not, it makes a world of difference to me, a humble reader). Pure imagination is good but I really wonder why some of them have adapted such a negligent stance. After all this is an interesting topic and research has never been easier than today – all you have to do is to sit in your room before your laptop or your PC and read and you might find plenty of food for your thoughts. Too simple? Ok, let’s make it even simpler then. Today I am starting my concise history with fangs. Its aim will be to show that vampires (and also werewolves) weren’t born yesterday and haven’t been created by either Stephanie Meyer or even Bram Stoker. They are truly ancient and fascinating. I hope you will enjoy this one - let's go on a historical trip through ages and continents!


Part one

Antiquity - godesses and monsters

Sumerian Terracotta relief, Lilith, 1950 BCE. ...Summerian terracota relief showing a blood-drinking monster with owls via Wikipedia
When did vampires begin? It seems as early as any human civilization, probably even earlier. The exact date of origin is unknown; but evidence of the vampire-related tales can be found in many places. For example in ancient Persia a vase was discovered depicting a man struggling with a huge creature which is trying to suck his blood. Similar evidence was found with the ancient Chaldeans in Mesopotamia, near the Tigris and the Euphrates rivers, and with Assyrian and Summerian writings on clay or stone tablets. The land of the Chaldeans is also called the "Ur of the Chaldeans," which was the original home of Abraham from the Bible. Here we meet the first real thing.

"Lilith" was a possible vampiric monster from the ancient Hebrew Bible and its later interpretations - old Hebrew texts removed from the Old Testament, known as Apocrypha. Although she is described in the book of Isaiah, her roots are more likely in Babylonian demonology . Lilith was a monster who roamed at night taking on the appearance of an owl. She would hunt, seeking to kill the weakest - newborn children and pregnant women. According to Jewish tradition Lilith was the wife of Adam before there was Adam and Eve, but she was demonized because she refused to obey Adam. One version of the story says that she left her husband due to his sexual ineptitude, becoming the Queen of Demons and Evil spirits. In modern terms and from a more liberated viewpoint, she demanded equal rights becoming almost a first feminist. Naturally, she was considered evil for such "radical" desires and became a vampire who eventually attacked the children of Adam and Eve - all their human descendants. Because Hebrew law absolutely forbade the eating of human flesh or the drinking of any type of blood, Lilith's blood drinking was described as exceptionally evil. To ward off attacks from Lilith, parents used to hang amulets from their child's cradle - this is in a way continued up to now, with different rattles adorning pushchairs and prams.
Lilith (1892) by John Collier in Southport Atk...Lilith with a snake by John Collier via Wikipedia


In the medieval text Alphabet of Ben Sira the story of Lilith is finished this way:


“Whenever I see you or your names or your forms in an amulet, I will have no power over that infant.' She also agreed to have one hundred of her children die every day. Accordingly, every day one hundred demons perish, and for the same reason, we write the angels' names on the amulets of young children. When Lilith sees their names, she remembers her oath, and the child recovers.”


The Ancient Egyptian goddess Sekhmet in one myth became full of bloodlust after slaughtering humans and was only sated after drinking alcohol colored as blood (other gods didn’t want her to kill all the humans so they decided to get her drunk and finish the folly). Still she was a goddess.

It was continued in the European civilizations - ancient Greece and Rome. There were numerous bloodthirsty Goddesses in both Roman and Greek mythology, known as Lamiae, Empusae and Striges. These names eventually evolved into the general terms for Witches, Demons and Vampires. The Vampires, though they did drink blood, were in fact goddesses not "living Dead" or “undead” people - disembodied divinities capable of taking on human appearances so that they might seduce their victims.

The ancient Greeks believed in the strigoe or lamiae, who were monsters who ate children and drank their blood. The first Lamia, (Greek: Λάμια) was human, though - the beautiful queen of Libya and the lover of Zeus, the Greek king of all gods; Zeus's wife, Hera, fought against her (Hera, being one seriously jealous wife, fought most of her husband’s lovers whenever she could find them as she could do nothing to her philandering husband). Lamia was driven insane, and she killed her own offspring. Then she was turned into a monster - half woman, half serpent. At night, it was said, she hunted other human children to kill as well. Myths variously describe Lamia's monstrous  appearance as a result of either Hera's wrath, the pain of grief, the madness that drove her to murder, or - in some rare versions - a natural result of being Hecate's daugter. Nothing is known about the creation of other Lamias or how they propagated. Apparently the name “Lamia” was popular among Greek courtesans (heteras).

Other tale, known by both the Greeks and Romans, concerns the wedding of a young man named Menippus. At the wedding a guest, who was a noted philosopher called Apollonius of Tyana, carefully observed the bride, who was said to be very beautiful but somehow strange. Apollonius finally accused the wife of being a vampire, and according to the story (as it was later told by a scholar named Philostratus in the first century A.D.) the wife confessed to vampirism. Allegedly she was planning to marry Menippus merely to have him handy as a source of fresh blood to drink. Talk about ultimate exploitation of a husband. Here we deal with the first myth about a human vampire.

Roman’s vampires were called Strix and apparently, were borrowed from the Greeks with one difference - they were male. The earliest recorded tale of the strix is from the lost Ornithologia of the Greek author Boios, which is partially preserved in Antoninus Liberalis's Metamorphoses. This tells the story of Polyphonte and her two sons Agrios and Oreios (their father being a wild bear), who were punished for their cannibalism, by being transformed into wild animals. Polyphonte became a strix (so an owl) "that cries by night, without food or drink, with head below and tips of feet above, a harbinger of war and civil strife to men”. Ovid tells the story of striges attacking the legendary king Procas in his cradle, and how they were warded off with arbutus (small trees or shrubs with red flaking bark and edible red berries) and placated with the meat of pigs, as an explanation for the custom of eating beans and bacon on the Kalends of June.

Romans and Greeks were also the first to write something about werewolves, monsters like vampires but able to change their shape. Herodotus in his Histories wrote that the Neuri, a tribe he places to the north-east of Scythia, were all transformed into wolves once every year for several days, and then changed back. In Greek mythology, the story of Lycaon provides one of the earliest examples of a werewolf legend. According to one version, Lycaon was transformed into a wolf as a result of eating human flesh; one of those who were present at periodical sacrifice on Mount Lycæon was said to suffer a similar fate.In Metamorphoses, the Roman poet Ovid described stories of men who roamed the woods of Arcadia in the form of wolves. The Roman scholar Pliny the Elder, relates two tales of lycanthropy. Quoting Euanthes he mentions a man who hung his clothes on an ash tree and swam across an Arcadian lake, transforming him into a wolf. On the condition that he attacked no human being for nine years, he would be free to swim back across the lake to resume human form. Pliny also quotes Agriopas regarding a tale of a man who was turned into a wolf after tasting the entrails of a human child.

More legends about vampires continued throughout all the world, including India, Malaysia, Polynesia and the lands of the Aztecs and Eskimos but, as it is a concise version of history, I won't repeat here every single one of them, just a few which seemed more original than the others.

According to the Aztecs, the offering of a young victims blood to the Gods ensured the fertilization of the earth. In India, tales of vetalas, ghoul-like beings that inhabit corpses, are found in old Sanskrit folklore. A prominent story tells of King Vikramaditya and his nightly quests to capture an elusive vetala. The vetala legends have been compiled in the book Baital Pachisi. The vetala is an undead creature, who like the bat associated with modern day vampirism, hangs upside down on trees found in cremation grounds and cemeteries. In ancient Nepal vampires may have existed as well - at least in legend. Some very old paintings (as old as 3000 B.C.) on the walls of caves depict blood drinking creatures; the Nepalese "Lord of Death" is shown holding a blood-filled goblet in the form of a human skull standing in a pool of blood. The most famous Indian deity associated with drinking blood is Kali, who has fangs, wears a garland of corpses or skulls and has four arms (picture above). Her temples are located near cremation grounds. She and the goddess Durga battled the demon Raktabija who could reproduce himself from each drop of blood spilled. Kali drank all his blood so none was spilled, thereby winning the battle and killing him. The hopping corpse is an equivalent of the vampire in Chinese tradition; however, it consumes the victim's life essence (chi or qi) rather than blood and it is called kiang shi.

I hope the first part wasn't too long; in the next one I will try to describe the development of stories about vampires and werewolves  from the Middle Ages to 18th century.

Sources:


Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, 20 February 2011

Reviewing a classic: Princesse de Clèves by Marie de la Fayette

About the author:
Madame de La FayetteImage via Wikipedia


Marie Madeleine Pioche de la Vergne was born and raised in Paris, to members of the minor nobility. Her father died when Marie was 15, and in the following year her mother married a member of the Sevigne family, which brought Marie a connection to Madame de Sevigne, who would become her closest friend. Marie Madeleine became an attendant to the queen, Anne of Austria, and began the study of classical literature and modern languages.

At 20, Marie Madeleine was married to Francois Motier, Comte de La Fayette, of Auvergne, a widower 18 years older; the couple had two sons. For about five years, Madame de la Fayette lived part of the time in Auvergne and part in Paris but by the end of 1660 she was already living permanently in Paris, while her husband remained in Auvergne. There was no formal separation - her husband even visited occasionally and signed papers allowing her to control her own finances. However, she began the friendship with the Duc de la Rochefoucauld, which would last until his death. All was done so discreetly that there was no gossip, even in a small society that relished romantic rumours so much.

During the 1670's La Fayette and La Rouchefoucauld, both in failing health, appear to have worked together on La Princesse de Clèves The novel was published anonymously in 1678, and although La Fayette denied authorship for both herself and La Rouchefoucauld, their closest friends believed it to have been their collaborative effort. An immense success, the work is often taken to be the first true French novel and the first attempt at analyzing psychological nature of the main character (and other characters as well).

Synopsis:
Title page of Marie-Madeleine de la Fayette's ...Image via Wikipedia

Mademoiselle de Chartres is a high-born, beautiful but a bit sheltered heiress, aged 15. Her mother has brought her to the court of Henri II (a disguised version of the court of Louis XIV) to seek a husband with good financial and social prospects. Old jealousies against a kinsman spark intrigues against the young girl and, as a result, the best marriage candidates suddenly withdraw. Poor Mademoiselle and her maman are devastated – the girl decides to accept a middling suitor, the Prince de Clèves. He at least is being smitten with her. Mademoiselle doesn’t love him, however. After her marriage, she meets the dashing Duc de Nemours, described as "nature's masterpiece" and "the most handsome and the most nobly built man in the world" and the two fall in love at first sight during a dance. Still they do nothing to pursue their affections, limiting their contact, comme il fault, to an occasional visit in the now-Princess of Clèves's salon. It doesn't mean their passion is lukewarm, quite the contrary in fact.

The Duc becomes involved in a scandal at court. It leads the Princess to believe that he has been unfaithful in his affections. A letter from a spurned mistress to her paramour is discovered in the dressing room at one of the estates. The letter is actually to the Princess' uncle, the Vidame de Chartres, who has also become entangled in a relationship with the Queen. The Vidame begs the Duc de Nemours to claim ownership of the letter, which ends up in the Princess' possession. The Duc has to produce documents from the Vidame to convince the Princess that his heart has been true - he manages to do it, finally receiving the proof that the lady loves him back. It seems that the happiness is just a few days away.

Mme de Clèves indeed feels more and more inclined, against her strict code of honour, to cheat on her husband with the Duc. In her bewildered attempt to free herself from M. de Nemours' hypnotic spell, she even does the unthinkable - she confesses to her husband that she has fallen in love with another man (without at first naming M. de Nemours, but the husband eventually identified him anyway). M. de Clèves, falls ill and later dies of jealousy (or rather of a broken heart as he truly loved his wife). On his deathbed, he blames the Duc for his illness and begs his wife not to marry him.
Portrait de Jacques de Savoie, duc de Nemours....Portrait of the Duc the Nemours (yes, he was real and hansome) via Wikipedia

The Princess is now footloose and fancy free (at least officially) as a young widow but deep down she remains torn between her duty and her love. The Duc pursues her more openly now as she is “up for grabs” again. What will she do – follow the advice of her dearly loved (but now dead) mother and the plea of her late husband or pursue her own passion? I decided not to spoil you this time (although it is a classic novel so you can find the end of the story without any problems anywhere).

What I liked:

I must admit this novel recreates the era of Henry II with remarkable precision – every historical romance writer should follow this example. Nearly every character – except the heroine – is a historical figure. Events and intrigues are unfold with great faithfulness to documentary record.

I also loved the intricacy of the story, the attention to detail, and how relevant the plot is to today's woman struggling to balance duty and personal identity. Although our Princess (we never get to know her name - too close to home?) neither wields a sword nor fights monsters, kicking their backsides now and then, her inner struggle is noneless epic and she certainly doesn't lack backbone. In fact sometimes I wished she had a bit less of that backbone - for her own good. Apart from that I was especially pleased how a magnificent contrast between the shallow, self-seeking motives of the majority of the royal circle and the unselfish delicacy of the lovers was presented – truly some contemporary romance writers would need to take a leaf out of Mme de la Fayette’s book.

Finally, I liked the Henri II & Diane de Poitiers romance very much, some of which plays in the background of the Princess of Cleves' story.
Diane de Poitiers (that's how I imagine our Princess might look like)

What I didn’t like:

Well, to put it shortly if you dislike unhappy endings don't read this one. The ending wasn’t illogical or silly, quite the contrary, but a bit over the top for any contemporary reader – the heroine was so driven by  her virtue and proper behavior that she appeared to me simply foolish from time to time. I also must mention that the book starts out in a rather confusing way, describing too many people and their relationships and alliances at once. If you like the historical background you will find it still ok; if you don’t, you can always skip a paragraph or two.

Final verdict:

One of these rare romance novels which stay with you after you have finished reading and make you think. I really enjoyed this book, and I'm sure I'll read it again one day.

A teaser:

“I adore you, I hate you, I offend you, I beg your forgiveness; I am filled with wonder and admiration for you, and with shame at these feelings. In brief, there is no longer tranquility or reason in me.”

Coats of Arms of the Dukes of Savoy after Henr...Image via Wikipedia

Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, 19 February 2011

Thursday, 17 February 2011

Review: Graceling by Kristin Cashore

Reading level: Young Adult
Hardcover: 471 pages
GracelingImage via Wikipedia
Publisher: Harcourt Children's Books (October 1, 2008)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 015206396X
ISBN-13: 978-0152063962
genre: fantasy, adventure

Synopsis:

Katsa, a princess living in a fatansy kingdom, is a Graceling - someone given a particular supernatural gift at birth. Such people are distinguished by her different-colored eyes and can be gifted any skill – from dancing and cooking to sword-fighting and mind-reading. If your Grace is useful a king might invite you to stay at his court and serve him. If you are not invited you become an outcast and a freak.

Katsa’s Grace is a rare one; people around her think she is Graced with killing. Even as a child she has been deadly - she has been able to kill a man with her bare hands since she was eight. This ability has left her isolated from much of society but also secured her place at her uncle's court. She has been used as a crude weapon by  king Randa who usually sends her to twist the arms (or even execute) of those who cross him. People are afraid of her, they start calling her a monster. She is lonely.

As Katsa grows up she is becoming less than happy with this arrangement. She’d rather not hurt everyone, and she’d rather not be her uncle’s dangerous lapdog. Guilt ridden by the pain that she has caused she forms a secret Council to do good work, but that is insufficient. When she meets Prince Po, looking for his kidnapped grandfather, her thoughts turn in new directions, and she has some choices to make. Katsa has no hint of how her life is about to change. She never expects to become Po’s friend. She never expects to learn a new truth about her own Grace — or about a terrible secret that lies hidden far away but might influence her very existence.

What I liked:

This is a character-driven novel so small wonder characters are original - you hardly ever meet a princess-cum-hangman in other fantasy novels. I loved the idea of graces - the eye thing was neat, too. I liked  Bitterblue, even if she was way too unrealistic to sound like a normal child. Prince Po, despite his laughable name, was a decent guy. There were some nice twists in the novel too. I never saw the demise of the bad guy coming the way it did.

What I didn’t like:

To be totally honest and not  to put too fine a point on it the world building sucks in this one. The names of five out of seven kingdoms are thinly disguised versions of North, South, East, West, and Middle. What’s more, if a king’s name is Ror, his kingdom’s capital is called…Ror City. Another king is called Leck and his capital is called…Leck City. And so on. King Randa, Katsa’s weak and bullying uncle? You guessed it right – he lives in Randa City. Every time I read these names all the fictional magic reality faded to a weak spark. What’s the point of writing a fantasy book if you can’t invent/find some good names for places and people? Prince PO, my goodness… is the boy supposed to be a badly-behaved Pekingese? Not the nickname I would have given a Prince (even if it was explained in a logical way).

Apart from that this book could have used a better editing job – you can figure out the mystery about 1/2 way through. The climax was somehow written in such a way that it became an anti-climax for me. The ending seemed to flop pretty hardcore. Another example: readers are introduced to a slew of characters that I also had no idea until much later who the hell they were. Couldn’t it be done in a more sensible way?  The villain, king Leck, appeared too few times to become a fully-fledged evil character which might be interesting enough to hate and it is a pity because he had a potential for a big nasty baddie.

Last but not least: there are some underage sex scenes in this book and I am sure some people wouldn’t feel comfortable with this subject matter in a YA novel. The whole "romance" left me confused. Katsa is against the very idea of  marriage and children but her verbal agreeing of having no strings attached sex completely clashed with what was written during the act itself. Here is why I am not buying the casual sex bit in this book: no strings attached sex does not end in tears on the girl in question’s part ( she was the one who wanted to keep it casual) and certainly does not cause feelings of distress upon imagining your “casual sex partner” leaving you, in this case Katsa imagining her life without Po and feeling totally miserable because of her vision. One brighter spot: I must commend Cashore for having Katsa on birth control (the plants she chewed on). A very reasonable move.

Final verdict:

I am afraid the story left me somewhat unsatisfied. Although Graceling was a quick read for such a hefty novel and there is a lot of potential between the 7 kingdoms and the Graced I am not sure I would like to get its sequel.
I only hope the authoress will improve (it was her debut novel).
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, 15 February 2011

All glitter? A vampire? Nah, it must be made of Swarovski crystal (+ a giveaway)

 Have you ever admired beautiful (but a bit expensive) earrings, necklaces, pendants and rings with multi-coloured crystals which brilliance is comparable to that of a diamond? If yes you are undoubtedly familiar with the brand name of Swarovski and you recognize that characteristic swan logo.





The company manufactures crystal jewelry stones, crystal gifts and objects--including its famed collection of miniature animals--and accessories, as well as crystal-based materials for the fashion industry, and components for crystal chandeliers. Swarovski is also well-known for its Swarovski Optik subsidiary's line of high-performance telescopes, gun-sites, and binoculars for hunters and birdwatching enthusiasts.
It all started in 1895 when Daniel Swarovski established his crystal cutting company. As a young man Daniel apprenticed within his father's own Bohemian glass foundry. Bohemia at that time was renowned throughout Europe and America for its particular style of crystal glass making; crystal objects, produced there were perhaps not of the best quality but definitely cheaper than those from the famous Italian Murano island near Venice. Daniel Swarovski came up with the idea of cutting glass with an electric powered tool and improving its quality. By 1892 he had produced a workable prototype machine and decided to patent his invention. So effective was this machine in cutting and creating precision and multifaceted crystal glass, that he proceeded to set up his own company with some other financiers, Franz Weis and Armand Kosman. 
Bohemian glassesBohemian glasses - image by titanium22 via Flickr

Now let me explain shortly what crystal glass really consists of and why it is different than normal glass. Technically, the term crystal is not applied to glass, as glass, by definition, lacks a crystalline structure. The use of the term lead crystal remains popular for historical and commercial reasons, and originally stems from the Venetian use of the word cristallo to describe the rock crystal imitated by Murano glassmakers. Lead oxide added to the molten glass gives lead crystal a much higher index of refraction than normal glass, and consequently much greater "sparkle". Ordinary glass has a refractive index of n = 1.5; the addition of lead produces an index of refraction of up to 1.7. To put is shortly lead glass, although not exactly good for your health, is desirable owing to its decorative properties.

 For centuries, if you wanted to produce glass you had to have a lot of wood close at hand. Wood meant cheap energy. That’s why it had long been the habit for Bohemian glass foundries to be somewhat nomadic, needing to uproot their complete factory, with workers and families, and move to new forest lands, which would provide fuel for their furnaces for another decade or more. So, and after careful consideration, it was not too surprising that Swarovski and his new partners, Kosman and Franz Weis, decided to set up the new company in a new country far away from glass manufacturing competitors. Wattens in the Austrian Alps, not far from Innsbruck, was the chosen site. The choice was based on the fact that there was the recently created hydro-electricity plant within the vicinity, which provided cheap electrical energy without the need of clearing a forest.
Set jewellery 19cImage by Kotomicreations via Flickr

Swarovski's invention produced crystal gemstones of outstanding quality--and the patented process enabled the company to become the world's leading producer of crystals. In the late 19th Century, crystal was regularly used to enhance formal evening wear. Crystal pieces were actually sewn into formal jackets and gowns. Swarovski took advantage of this fashion trend and in 1913, he created his own crystals exclusively for the fashion industry.

Always the entrepreneur, Swarovski used the shortage of cutting machines and materials during World War I to enhance his business. For the war effort, Swarovski produced grinding and dressing tools that were used to process crystal stones and he marketed them under the name of Tyrolit from 1917 to 1919. Until about 1956, Swarovski would often use the innovations of his original crystal company by developing subsidiary companies which provided products for automotive and roadway reflectors, telescopes, and lenses. 

The 1930s saw several significant developments. The first of these was a line of crystal 'trimmings,' which debuted in 1931. The Swarovski trimmings featured the company's crystal gemstones prepared in a variety of ready-to-use formats for edging, hems, and borders. Also known as rhinestones, Swarovski's gemstones were of such high quality that they were often mistaken for real diamonds. 

In the 1930s, also, Wilhelm Swarovski, one of three sons of Daniel Swarovski, began work on a prototype for a pair of field binoculars. Apparently he had inherited his father's inventiveness, had joined the family company at the age of 17, and had long been conducting experiments in glass smelting techniques. Wilhelm Swarovski finished his prototype field glasses in 1935, developing new grinding techniques for the field glasses' hand-ground and polished optical components. The company's field glasses were to remain in the prototype stage, however, until after the war ended. 
beads be meBicone crystals via Wikipedia


Though the Great Depression of the early 1930s, and then also the Second World War reduced the demand for Swarovski glass, they were not altogether forgotten. However it took a new generation and the Aurora Borealis designs in the mid-1950s to reaffirm their reputation and innovation. This line of jewellery was the creation of the grandson, Manfred Swarovski, and possessed a dreamlike sparkle of rainbow colors created by a trace metal coating. The process was brought to perfection with input from Christian Dior, the famous French fashion designer. 

The 1970s marked the beginning of a new era for Swarovski. Until then, the company had never ventured into the consumer retail market. The worldwide recession of the decade, the result of the Arab Oil Embargo of 1973, had caused a dramatic drop in demand for the company's crystal gemstones. Manfred Swarovski was searching for a way to prop up the company's sales. As granddaughter, and future company Vice-President Nadja Swarovski told the Financial Times: My grandfather was fiddling around in his office with a few little crystals when it occurred to him that the pieces, arranged in a certain fashion, resembled a tiny mouse. That was his light bulb moment.' 

The first crystal collectible sold by Swarovski was a mouse figurine. The mouse, a best seller at the Innsbruck Olympic Games, enjoyed prominence throughout the world. In the early 1990s, exhibitions featured Swarovski crystal and its crystal technology. In 1995, the company celebrated its 100th anniversary with the production of a prominent Swarovski century swan in silver crystal. In that same year, the firm opened its exhibition center featuring a history of crystal and the Swarovski company. It is really worth visiting if you ever go to Austria.

Crystallized™ - Swarovski Elements is the new brand for the company's core products ~ loose, flawlessly cut crystal components.


Sources:
http://www.fundinguniverse.com/company-histories/Swarovski-International-Holding-AG-Company-History.html
http://www.jewelrymaking-beads-library.com/swarovski-002.html
http://www.drloriv.com/appraisals/swarovski.asp
http://www.thehistoryof.net/history-of-swarovski-crystal-glass.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lead_glass

MY FIRST SPRING GIVEAWAY

I decided to organize my first giveaway on this blog! In my free time I amuse myself with creating jewellery and I have designed for you all a pair of pierced earrings with one Swarovski pearl and one Swarovski bicone crystal each. As the spring is coming the pearl is daffodil-coloured and the colour of the crystal is described as “golden shadow” (on your monitor colours might look a bit different than in reality). They are ca. 4 cm (1.6 in) long – perfect for any occasion! The photo of the earrings can be found on the black hole page, linked here.



How to enter the giveaway?
It's easy.

You can win the earrings as long as you leave a comment below. In the comment you must include your contact e-mail address. One more thing -  you should be among the followers of this blog. As simple as that. The giveaway will be open for 13 days (so from 15 February to 1 March) and then the happy winner will be announced.
I ship internationally!
Good luck!
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, 14 February 2011

Five most annoying literary romances


It is known that there is no novel, especially no YA novel, without a romance. Romantic pairs are even featured in the Bible! Romance - for good or for BAD - is an immovable fixture in fiction. Somehow love makes the world, and the printing presses, go round as efficiently as money. Of course romance might be presented well, adding to the story, or badly, and destroy it completely for any sensible reader. If you read novels I am sure you know what I mean. You try to imagine such a romantic pair in reality and...you fail. In other words - bad romance. Nowadays books are full of them but even some classics didn't avoid this trap.

Here is my list of the five most annoying literary romances. Tell me what you think of it and what you would add to the list (or deduct from it) - have fun!

Saturday, 12 February 2011

Silent Saturday