Two Movies Duel Review
Skyfall vs. Argo
1. Presentation of the opponents (a.k.a synopsis):
2. Round one: reality check
Skyfall: James Bond, a creation of Ian Fleming, has never been real, not to me anyway. How could he? The guy changes faces like girlfriends and girlfriends like tuxedos and other spying gadgets. At first he looked like this:
| Ian Fleming's image of James Bond; commissioned to aid the Daily Express comic strip artists. (Photo credit: Wikipedia) |
Argo: Antonio J. Mendez, on the other hand, was based on a real CIA officer so here he wins, hands down.
James: 0 points
Tony: 2 points
3. Round two - likeability factor
Skyfall features a Bond who has something to prove, and who could be damaged goods, physically and mentally, like any other mortal. He also is not exactly handsome - jug-eared and bandy-legged, definitely older and weary. Did it work? Yes, it did - I was impressed, James! What a change compared to the previous Bond movies full of agressive males in their primes! You are no longer fit but even at your lowest you were still capable of pulling off a very scary drinking trick involving a scorpion. Overall you become attractively human (though never humane) which really suited me fine.
Argo's character is based on a real hero so it should have been even better but somehow he wasn't. I admit Ben Afleck tried and tried to make his Tony three-dimensional and likeable. A bit of personal drama? Here you go, he and his wife are in separation and it is obvious he misses her rather badly. Not even a whiff of an office romance, no clubbing, just pure depression. A cute kid to make the soft-hearted ladies swoon? Not a problem, Tony has a little son and he loves him dearly, trying to relate to him even if they live apart (aww...a family guy!). Did it work? No. It sounded spurious and somehow, looking at the smooth, thoughtless face of Mr. Afleck, covered so becomingly with facial hair, I didn't care or liked his character.
James: 2 points
Tony: 1 point
4. Round three - visuals
Skyfal is hands down the most visually beautiful Bond movie I have ever seen. Usually such flicks are watched just for action and fighting scenes, guns and babes. This one is different. From the opening in Istanbul to the final siege shootout in the Scottish Highlands, this film is a supremely enjoyable when it comes to the landscapes, presented. My favourites? Shanghai at night and the deep Scottish countryside in the mist. Incredible!
Argo's crew evidently had a lot of fun with the Chia Pet facial hair, oversize glasses, wide collars, fat ties and earth-toned threads - so did I while watching it! The movie takes us to Hollywood and to Iran. Hollywood is more or less well-known but Teheran shots were really interesting. Still nothing can match Scotland!
James: 2 points
Tony: 1 point
5. Round four: secondary characters
Skyfall: Say what you might but Dame Judi Dench stole the show, at least for me. Playing M, Bond's boss, she dominates every frame with her character, being 100% better and more interesting than any Bond girl and/or associate, featured so far. She is so irritating at the opening, so poignant and admirable at its end that she turns into a kind of fulcrum of the whole movie. A great performance!
Argo: There are plenty of secondary characters which were better/more likeable than the main hero. Which was kind of weird because well, aren't you supposed to support the lead the most? Instead you laugh and cheer John Chambers (played by John Goodman, breezy and reined in), a real makeup artist and a curmudgeonly Jewish producer, Lester Siegel (a wonderful Alan Arkin) - two Hollywood beasts who help make the fake project sound real and legit.
James: 2 points
Tony: 1.5 points
6. Roud five: the ending
Skyfall shows once again the wisdom of Godard's dictum that all you need to make a movie is a girl and a gun and once the girl is dead or married and the gun - shot the movie ends. Still I liked the ending far better than the antics connected to your common and garden James Bond movie.
Argo is a very optimistic thriller - in the end, this is a story about outwitting rather than killing the enemy, making it a homage to actual intelligence and an example of the same. Very uplifiting! Still the director didn't manage to avoid some cheesiness so my rating is lower a bit.
James: 2 points
Tony: 1.5 points
7. Duel results
James: 8 points
Tony: 7 points
James Bond prevailed but it was a close-run contest - in my opinion Skyfall was only marginally better and, mind you, it was pitted against a rather weak movie too. In fact both filcks can be described as examples of decent cinematic workmanship but nothing special. In the case of an Oscar-winning movie it's criticizm, in the case of another James Bond installment it is a compliment - here I see the main difference.
What do you think? Have you seen any of these? If yes, did you enjoy them?
5. Round four: secondary characters
Skyfall: Say what you might but Dame Judi Dench stole the show, at least for me. Playing M, Bond's boss, she dominates every frame with her character, being 100% better and more interesting than any Bond girl and/or associate, featured so far. She is so irritating at the opening, so poignant and admirable at its end that she turns into a kind of fulcrum of the whole movie. A great performance!
Argo: There are plenty of secondary characters which were better/more likeable than the main hero. Which was kind of weird because well, aren't you supposed to support the lead the most? Instead you laugh and cheer John Chambers (played by John Goodman, breezy and reined in), a real makeup artist and a curmudgeonly Jewish producer, Lester Siegel (a wonderful Alan Arkin) - two Hollywood beasts who help make the fake project sound real and legit.
James: 2 points
Tony: 1.5 points
6. Roud five: the ending
Skyfall shows once again the wisdom of Godard's dictum that all you need to make a movie is a girl and a gun and once the girl is dead or married and the gun - shot the movie ends. Still I liked the ending far better than the antics connected to your common and garden James Bond movie.
Argo is a very optimistic thriller - in the end, this is a story about outwitting rather than killing the enemy, making it a homage to actual intelligence and an example of the same. Very uplifiting! Still the director didn't manage to avoid some cheesiness so my rating is lower a bit.
James: 2 points
Tony: 1.5 points
7. Duel results
James: 8 points
Tony: 7 points
James Bond prevailed but it was a close-run contest - in my opinion Skyfall was only marginally better and, mind you, it was pitted against a rather weak movie too. In fact both filcks can be described as examples of decent cinematic workmanship but nothing special. In the case of an Oscar-winning movie it's criticizm, in the case of another James Bond installment it is a compliment - here I see the main difference.
What do you think? Have you seen any of these? If yes, did you enjoy them?





Yay, you did it! I agree that the visuals in Skyfall were stunning--whatever they paid for those location shots, it was worth it. For a James Bond film, it was really really good, although Casino Royale is still the best IMO.
ReplyDeleteAs for Argo, I thought it was better than you did. It is an entertaining film, which I loved, but I also think it had a message: what it means to be an American. In some respects it reminded me of a western, although I'm not sure that was the filmmakers' intention. For me Argo won out by a short margin.
Argo didn't resonate with me, not really, maybe because I am not an American. As I said it wasn't a bad movie and I liked the story but it was kind of emotionally bland. And yes, I agree that there were western whiffs - a lonely hero on an almost-impossible mission, fighting the whole empire of evil...Enio Moricone would be so proud!
ReplyDeleteI watched Argo..enjoyed...eh, it was ok. So weird, why am I seeing your posts again?
ReplyDeletePerhaps just because I post...lol blogger can be unpredictable.
ReplyDeleteTotally. There was this blog that I follow, and one day I saw her complaining on twitter that her feed was broken and then I realised that I had not see her posts for weeks. Ok so yes I do suck, but some disappear now and again so I had not thought anything of it
ReplyDeleteYes, it's always worth going and checking, no matter what your feed says.
ReplyDelete