Sunday, 31 October 2010

Review: Ilona Andrews: Magic Burns (book 2)

Ilona Andrews: Magic Burns (book 2)
Mass Market Paperback: 272 pages
Publisher: Ace; First Printing edition (April 1, 2008)
ISBN-10: 0441015832

Synopsis


The second book reads like a separate episode - while it does help to have some prior knowledge of the “Kate Daniels and magical Atlanta” universe, it may not be required to enjoy the second book. My review of the first installment you can find clicking here.

Kate lives in an alternate city of Atlanta, Georgia, in a world where magic comes and returns in waves with technology. She works now as a liaison between The Mercenary Guild and The Order of Merciful Aid, but at heart she is still as independent as she has always been. She is having a hard time finding a boyfriend and doesn’t play nice with others. Add to that two mortgages and some telephone bills and you get enough trouble on any super-heroine’s plate to get a headache. Still, there's more.

Someone's stealing valuable maps from the local pack of wereanimals (for the lack of better words) and Kate's got to get them back. Apart from that a misguided coven makes an alliance with the wrong Celtic God and Kate's stuck with that coven member's daughter, Julie. The girl comes with all the troubles teenage girls are prone to - she's a virgin and her boyfriend, a ragtag street kid-shaman called Red, craving for magic, wants to use her for a source of some extra power. Guess how. He also wants Kate to protect Julie and help her find her mother who, along with the rest of her aforementioned coven of amateur witches, has disappeared. Pinning and sniveling Julie wouldn’t be as powerful. This search will lead Kate to a hole in the earth through which magic creatures are arriving. If Kate can't stop their advance, the entire population of Atlanta will be at risk The romance fans will be undoubtedly thrilled by Kate's relationship with Curran which really starts getting interesting as a supernatural rival enters the battle.

What I liked:

Magic Burns is a tease and a page-turner for a sequel, I admit, peppered with furry, sticky violence.The world is intriguing and well researched, integrating Celtic mythologies and new facts about shapeshifters and vampires. Ilona Andrews managed to create beings and monsters almost impossible to imagine and yet she made them all work, and work well at that. It’s true that Kate is a bit of a mouthy adolescent superhero herself but most of the other characters have real emotions, ambitions, anxieties, and make real mistakes. In short they are believable. One thing I like about Kate the best - finally we have a mysterious orphan girl who actually knows her parents, knows what happened to them and what she is destined for, in other words she knows more than the readers. She imparts that knowledge but she is in no rush about it.

What about the others? Curran, Samian and Bran were wonderful characters with many witty comebacks. Also interesting is the bouda, a werehyena - now she's a nifty character I'd like to read more about. Finally the theory behind the Lycos Virus is a fascinating, painful thing.

What I didn’t like:

As the book plot delves deeper into mythology, magic, more mythology, witches, giant tortoises and other monsters it becomes too complicated and definitely out of the realm my brain can or want to comprehend reading a recreational novel. Some twists of storytelling go simply too fast, especially those mixed up with lots of overly graphic gore. There were simply too many battle scenes for my liking. Perhaps I am getting soft.

Secondly some parts of the story veer too close to trash territory. Kate's mortified when people see her underwear, and its adornments. Who would believe it? Who would want to know? She also has that strange pointless fight with different objects of her attraction – how very immature for a powerful magic slinger! She is definitely too obsessed by rippling muscles and sex. In my opinion the plot suffers for it.

The final verdict:

I still like the series but I hope it will improve. Less trash sword-wielding, more character building. We’ll see – I intend to read the book number three.


Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, 29 October 2010

Thursday, 28 October 2010

What were they thinking?





This meme was started and hosted by Alayne from the Crowded Leaf.



At first glance this lovely cover might seem to be ok but...

If you are curious about the summary, you can find the review of this novel clicking here. In a nutshell: this lady, presumably the lively main heroine, lived in Regency era and she is dressed in an Empire dress...go figure. Next thing, in this picture the girl is playing a harp whereas the main heroine repeatedly announced in the novel that she couldn't play one single instrument, she could only play Faro which is not an instrument at all. In fact no other character in that book, male or female, played a harp EVER.
Somebody didn't do their homework?
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, 25 October 2010

A truly scary story - one case of witch hunt

One case of witch hunt




If somebody mentions Sweden, a beautiful Nordic country, what images appear in your mind? I instantly think: high standards of living, a bit cold climate, lovely landscapes, Vikings, ABBA, Ikea. These associations, even if correct nowadays, didn’t prepare me in any way for the story I’ve found not so long ago. It is known that historical facts can be a lot stranger and scarier than any spooky tales but this one exceeded my expectations. The series of events I am presenting  here simply sent shivers down my spine.

It was started like an avalanche, by one small lie stemming from hurt teenage pride. Of course the ground had to be prepared beforehand and I suppose some people just had been waiting for this small spark all along. Too harsh winter, too little food, some unknown diseases and even bad weather might have contributed to the whole atmosphere. In the autumn of 1667, a little shepherd boy, Mats Nilsson, claimed to have seen a girl walking on the water. The girl's name was Gertrud Svendsdotter. The boy had tended the herd of sheep with this same girl, they had had a fight; apparently the girl had beaten the boy up. She was twelve years old. Now, what would you do if your son or younger brother told you such a thing about one of his schoolmates? Probably you would laugh him off or even punish for being such a incurable little liar. The boy’s parents, though, took him to a priest named Lars Elvius and the priest believed in his story. Gertrud Svendsdotter was interrogated by the priest afterwards. Perhaps Lars was a bit too thrilled to discover a supernatural activity among his parishioners and perhaps he was just afraid of evil and wanted to make sure he wasn't dealing with a witch. After long talks with him scared Gertrud finally confessed that while she lived with her parents in Lillhärdal, a neighbour's maid had taken her to the Devil. The name of the maid was Märet Jonsdotter.

Gertrud's confession came after another shepherd boy, Erik Eriksson (15 years old), had reported, that he had had a vision in the woods where he was sucked up in the air and saw Gertrud sit in Blockula with the children she had taken, among them his little sister. You should notice the fact that it was enough for young Erik  to present his testimony once, but he was immediately given full credit by the priest of having revealed the whole affair. Once again nobody even tried to cross-check the boy’s story as they should.

Blockula (Blåkulla in modern Swedish), mentioned by the children, was a legendary meadow where the Devil held his Earthly court during a witches' Sabbat. This meadow could only be reached by a magical flight. It was described as "a delicate large Meadow, whereof you can see no end". Reading the description of Blockula I kept wondering what made serious people believe in such stories. Apparently they must have wanted rather badly to find a supernatural explanations to their ailments in the first place and their faith must have been approved and confirmed by some higher moral authorities, be them lay persons or clerical officials. No matter what their reasons were, the confession of Gertrud was the starting point of the famous "Mora witch trials" and Märet Jonsdotter became the first victim  but not the only one – Gertrud, maybe forced to do so or maybe being simply on a roll, pointed out seven others. So began the real witch hunt in Sweden, a country where witch trials had previously been a rarity. Märet Jonsdotter was called to court to answer to the accusations. The witch trial started in September 1668.

 The story about the children's stay in the Witches' Sabbath in Blockula spread rapidly, and everywhere children started to talk about it and make up other stories, setting the tongues wagging and pointing the fingers at people often from their closest family, mostly women. The stories spread across the parishes, and increased when the priests made the verdicts public by announcing them in church as a warning. Children’s confessions were very similar to the first ones and were to be a standard for the following witch trials of 1668-1676.Let’s quote one of them (from Sadducismus Triumphatus) :

"In Blockula, people partied as if at a wedding; they drank, ate, danced and had sex by the light of candles that were placed in vaginas while Satan sat under the table and laughed so that the whole room shook and the fire of hell poured up from a hole in the floor, where you could see the tormented souls in hell. You danced with your backs towards each other, as well as doing everything else backwards, married several people at the same time, and had sex with them and with Satan himself, and with his devils and demons, whose penises were cold and whose sperm was made of water and gave birth to frogs that were swept up from the floor with a broom and were made into butter. When you woke up afterwards, your body ached, the food you had eaten had vanished and made you hungry and the gifts you had received had turned to woodchip."
As you see in every age and epoch children knew more about sex and other forbidden practices than the adults wanted them to know. Strange thing, the kidnapped children, apart from Satan and his demons, also claimed to have seen angels. The angels role was far from precise - they pulled the Devil's food away from children's hands, cried tears as big as peas, and asked them to confess so the witches could be exterminated and send the message that one should not have to work on Thursdays, nor use shirts with frilled sleeves, and not have to sell tobacco above its fairest price. Apparently those were the woes of the day: lack of leisure time, frilled sleeves, not accessible to everyone, and high prices of tobacco. I just wonder why angels didn’t know about the hazards of smoking. 

I suppose it’s easy to guess why children so eagerly decided to include angels in their accounts. Their situation was rather dubious; they were not only victims of the witches but also their accomplices. They had sworn themselves to the Devil, eaten his food and had sex. To claim angelic help was believed to be a way for the children to point out that they had been innocent victims after all. In some cases it worked, in some – not. More problematic is finding the answer to the question why the court was never very interested in the angels; they asked the children, if the angels really did try to stop them from eating Satan's food, but they never enquired why they didn’t not stop them from doing worse, such as having sex with the demons. Perhaps it was a minor issue for the judges.

On the April 1, 1669, Märet Jonsdotter and another defendant, Widow Karin, were judged guilty against their own words. There was a problem, however. Swedish law forbade the execution of anyone who had not confessed their crime, no matter if they were found guilty or not. Neither of the women was willing to admit any guilt, and they continued to plead innocent, just as they had done from the day they were accused. Perhaps they had a hunch such a move could save their life or perhaps they were simply more stubborn than the others. This put the court in a dilemma - they decided upon a plan to solve this legal problem. Apparently they aim from the onset was not to find out the truth but to get the women to confess and make it possible to execute them.The priests were to persuade them to confess by using religious arguments; they were instructed to lie and tell them that they were to be executed whether they confessed or not. But if they confessed, they would receive holy communion, and thereby go straight to heaven. They were to be taken to the place of execution believing this, given the communion, and the execution would be conducted afterwards. This whole plan was put into effect and conducted just as described. At the place of execution, Märet and Karin were told that they could confess and receive communion, or deny all. Both chose to say no to communion and deny the charges. The frustrated authorities then had no choice but to escort Märet Jonsdotter and Karin back to prison. Gertrud Svensdotter, the girl who started the folly, and the siblings of Märet, also accused in this trial, were flogged and then released. The remaining people were acquitted, but the hysteria was hard to stop. Soon, 23 people was put on trial for abducting of children to Satan, and in 19 May 1669, eight people (seven women and one man) were executed as result of the process against Märet Jonsdotter. Throughout this time, she had remained in prison, exposed to continued religious persuasion from the priests to confess her sin. During four years imprisonment and attempts to brainwash her, she continued to declare her innocence and refused to confess. She never did confess. She was sentenced and executed all the same.

In 16 April 1672, despite her constant denial, Svea Hovrätt, the Swedish Court of Appeal, declared Märet guilty of sorcery due to all the incriminating testimonies, and the devil's mark on her finger; she was to be decapitated and burned. She was judged together with thirty four people; of them, four defendants, including three women, received a death sentence. Of the condemned, Märet Jonsdotter and a man named Pål Märet were the only ones who were executed without having confessed guilty; the rest all admitted guilt. There is not much known about the final execution apart from the fact that it happened.
The court declared that: "Her mere denial can not help her nor free her from the life sentence"; the same year, the court had noticed that several people accused had become aware that they would escape a death sentence if they maintained their innocence, and therefore, and one of the eight people executed for witch craft in Ovanåker in 1672 had been executed without a confession; from 1674, it was declared no longer necessary with a confession in the case of witch craft.

The witch hysteria continued to rage through the country until the execution of another woman in Stockholm in 1676. In 1677, to avoid any further witch trials, the government ordered the priests to declare, through the churches, that all witches had now been expelled from the country forever. Apparently finally everyone has just had enough of it. 


As witch hunts occured also in plenty of other countries at that time you might wonder what were the reasons of such attrocities. Some historians say that witchcraft accusations were a social mechanism,  resolving conflicts within any given community and providing an easy explanation of misfortunes happening to people in their daily life. This hysteria, however, seemed to me more horrible exactly because it explained nothing and it  involved children as well as the weakest people from any given community -  outcasts, women living alone like spinsters or widows, and solitary men. Scapegoats. It was enough a deranged or angry child testified against you and your life could turn into nightmare and terminate prematurely. Lately I've read the "Hunger Games" series by Suzanne Collins in which children and teenagers were turned into weapons and killers; the books were also pretty scary but there was at least that ugly, sadistic government which could be blamed for the children's  fate as they were organizing and supporting the whole horrible "entertainment". Although in 17th century Sweden people must have supported witch hunts and certainly some priests had forced children to testify, I have noticed that there were also those boys and girls who cast suspicions and accused their family and friends out of their free will, simply for the heck of it. In some cases they were in turn accused, judged guilty and actually sentenced to death for committing perjury. Facts are always stranger than fiction -  compare it to any average ghost story.


My sources:
Brian P. Levack, “The witch-hunt in early modern Europe” 
William E. Burns, “Witch hunts in Europe and America: an encyclopedia” 
Wikipedia: Sadducismus Triumphatus, Märet Jonsdotter, Blockula

 

Saturday, 23 October 2010

Silent Sunday

Wednesday, 20 October 2010

Reviewing a classic - Bleak House by Charles Dickens

Reviewing a classic - Bleak House by Charles Dickens
Cover of serial, Image via Wikipedia

Introduction

Bleak House was the ninth novel by Charles Dickens, published in twenty installments. Small wonder - it is really a monster of a book. It is also the only Dickens’s novel in which the story is partly told by one of female leads and then complemented by an omniscient narrator. The synopsis of such a long, multi-layered story is really a challenge – I am sure that Dickens would have loved those soap operas which drag on interminably and are understood just by a handful of devoted fans - so please forgive me if I omit anything important. I also decided to use a bit of the appropriate Wikipedia’s summary. The task was simply too big to be handled on my own especially that I lacked time so I needed help very badly.

 Synopsis:

First we meet Esther Summerson, a shy good-looking girl raised by Miss Barbary. When Miss Barbary dies, the Chancery lawyer takes charge of Esther's future on the instruction of his client, John Jarndyce. Jarndyce becomes Esther's guardian, and after attending school in Reading for six years, she goes to live with him at Bleak House, along with his wards, Richard Carstone and Ada Clare. Esther is to be Ada's companion. Esther does not realize that Miss Barbary is her aunt, thinking of her only as her godmother. It is a known trick of Mr. Dickens – as readers we know far much about the characters than the characters themselves. Esther soon befriends both Ada and Richard, who are cousins. They are named beneficiaries in one of the wills at issue in Jarndyce and Jarndyce; their guardian is a beneficiary under another will, and in some obscure way the two wills conflict. Apparently the long-running litigation provides jobs for half the lawyers in London and the other half has plenty of entertainment for free. Richard and Ada are created for each other – they soon fall in love, but though Mr. Jarndyce does not oppose the match, he does stipulate that Richard (who suffers from inconstancy of character) must first choose a profession. When Richard mentions the prospect of benefiting from the resolution of Jarndyce and Jarndyce, John Jarndyce asks him never to put faith in what he calls "the family curse".

Sir Leicester Dedlock and young, beautiful Honoria, Lady Dedlock, live at Chesney Wold, a very fine estate. Lady Dedlock is one of few female characters with some backbone. Her past is rather unsavoury, though. She used to have a lover, Captain Hawdon, before her marriage. She also gave birth to an illegitimate child -Esther Summerson – but she thinks the child is dead. It is one big secret. Lady Dedlock lives in a state of constant boredom; I suppose her mannerism was nothing else than classic depression – after all Captain Hawdon was the love of her life and he left her.It happens that Lady Dedlock is also a beneficiary under one of the wills in Jarndyce and Jarndyce. Early in the book, while talking to her solicitor, Tulkinghorn, she recognizes the handwriting on the copy of an affidavit. The sight affects her so much that she almost faints, which the solicitor notes and thinks important enough to investigate. He guesses that Lady Dedlock has focused on the affidavit's handwriting a bit to intensely and wants to trace the copyist. He discovers that the copyist was a drug fiend known only as "Nemo" and that he has recently died. The only person to identify him is a street-sweeper, a poor homeless boy named Jo. Lady Dedlock wants to find out the copyist too so she disguises herself rather badly as her French maid and she pays Jo to take her to Nemo's grave. Tulkinghorn begins to watch her every move, even enlisting the aid of Hortense, the maid who hates s her secretly. Hortense and Tulkinghorn will soon discover the truth about Lady Dedlock's past. After a desperate confrontation with the lawyer, Lady Dedlock flees her home, leaving a note to her husband apologizing for her conduct. Tulkinghorn dismisses Hortense who is no longer of any use to him. Hortense kills Tulkinghorn and seeks to frame Lady Dedlock for his murder. On discovering his lawyer's death and his wife's flight, Sir Leicester suffers a catastrophic stroke but manages to communicate that he forgives his wife and wants her to return to him. After all she was twenty years younger and pretty.

A little earlier Esther happens to meet her mother at a church service and has a conversation with her afterwards at Chesney Wold - though, at first, neither woman recognizes each other. Later, Lady Dedlock realises that her only child is not dead. She waits to confront Esther with this knowledge until Esther has survived a bout with smallpox. The illness disfigures Esther pernamently. Though they are happy at being reunited, Lady Dedlock tells Esther that they must never recognize their connection again.
Although Esther has recovered her health, her beauty is supposedly ruined. She finds that Richard, having tried and failed at several professions, has ignored his guardian's advice and is wasting all his resources in trying to push Jarndyce and Jarndyce to a conclusion (in his and Ada's favour). What’s more, he has broken with his guardian, under the influence of his lawyer. In the process of becoming an active litigant, Richard has lost all his money and is breaking his health. In further defiance of John Jarndyce, he and Ada have secretly married, and Ada is carrying Richard's child. Esther experiences her own quiet romance when Dr. Woodcourt, who knew her before her illness, returns from his mission and continues to seek her company despite her disfigurement. Unfortunately, Esther has already agreed to marry her guardian, John Jarndyce.
Inspector Bucket, who up to now has investigated several matters on the periphery of Jarndyce and Jarndyce, accepts the commission of the stricken Sir Leicester to find Lady Dedlock. He suspects Lady Dedlock, even after he arrests George Rouncewell (the only other person known to be with Tulkinghorn on the night of the murder, and known to have quarrelled with the lawyer repeatedly). Nonetheless, Bucket pursues the charge given to him by Sir Leicester and ultimately calls on Esther to assist in the search for Lady Dedlock. By this point, Bucket has cleared Lady Dedlock's name by discovering Hortense's guilt, but she has no way to know this, and, wandering London in cold and bitter weather, she ultimately dies at the cemetery where her former lover Captain Hawdon (Nemo) is buried. Esther and Bucket find her there.

Developments in Jarndyce and Jarndyce seem to take a turn for the better when a later will is discovered which revokes all previous wills and leaves the bulk of the estate to Richard and Ada. At the same time, John Jarndyce releases Esther from their engagement and she and Dr. Woodcourt become engaged. They go to Chancery to find Richard and to discover what news there might be of the lawsuit's resolution. To their horror, they discover that the new will is given no chance to resolve Jarndyce and Jarndyce, for the costs of litigation have consumed the estate, and as there is nothing left to litigate, the case melts away. After hearing this, Richard collapses, and Dr Woodcourt determines that he is in the last stages of tuberculosis. Richard apologizes to John Jarndyce and dies, leaving Ada alone with their child, a boy whom she names Richard. Jarndyce takes in Ada and the child. Esther and Woodcourt marry and live in Yorkshire, in a house which Jarndyce gives to them. In time, they have two daughters. Ugh. The end.

What I liked:

Some descriptions of the 19th century London were incredible. I also enjoyed the well-deserved criticism of Chancery institution. You can notice at once that Dickens's assault on the flaws of the British judiciary system was based in part on his own experiences as a law clerk, and in part on his experiences as a Chancery litigant seeking to enforce his copyright on his earlier books. Lady Dedlock and her scheming French maid, Hortense have always been my favourite characters. They are intrepid ladies although Hortense is a rogue and her ladyship is so obsessed that she cares for nothing but her former lover.

Plenty of secondary characters, like Jo and Charley deserved to play a greater role in the book.

What I didn’t like:

The book is definitely too long and too complex – I don’t doubt any contemporary editor would divide it into a series and perhaps  put to death many subplots and many characters for the sake of clarity as well. He/she would be absolutely right.

Esther's portion of the narrative is an interesting case study of the Victorian ideal of feminine modesty but interesting not always means good. If you appreciate all these resolute, kick-ass, funny heroines and you compare poor disfigured Esther with them you can describe her only as bland. Other females like Ada and Caddy Jellyby are equally insipid although Caddy at least married her chosen man and rebelled against a silly mother and Ada did manage to marry the worst candidate for a husband she could find. I don’t know, perhaps Victorians liked to get maudlin over a book and Dickens used their propensity to better the sales.

I also didn’t favour many male characters – especially stupid, pigheaded Richard Carstone with weak constitution and no brain to speak of. He married weak Ada and almost ruined her life – how very mature. His death was his only saving grace and it came too late. Also John Jarndyce seemed too kind-hearted and indulgent to be considered a well-rounded character. People who are apparently without vices make me shudder – one can’t help but wonder what they hide so well behind their nice façade.

The final verdict:

I will certainly return to some parts of this very long book; some of them I will omit for sure as they deserve nothing more than oblivion.

Signature of Charles DickensImage via Wikipedia
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, 19 October 2010

Wishful Wednesday, 20 October

Wishful Wednesday, 20 October

The meme is hosted by Brooke Bluestocking Guide.



 Welcome to Wishful Wednesday!

Today I wish I could grab a quite unusual book - "Hope in Patience" written by Beth Fehlbaum. The book is unusual because of  its topic - it deals with very serious (and sad) matters happening unfortunately to some young people nowadays. Here is an excellent summary, wrote by Larwal the Librarian (her full review of this book you can find clicking here):

Booktalk:
Finally out of her step-father's house where she suffered through years of sexual abuse at his hands, Ashley is adjusting to life in Patience, Texas. In Patience she has a father, a real father, who wants to protect her, a step-mother who doesn't see her as "the competition," a little brother who
will play his video games so loudly that he entire house shakes, and a therapist who refuses to let her wallow in her past. Basically, she has a chance at a normal life. But with the coming trial against her step-father, her own flashbacks, and a seriously misguided rumor mill threatening to drag her down, Ashley may never be able to focus on the "normal" problems she should be worrying about at her age: her last place status on the cross-country team, a group project with one of the most uncooperative group members ever, and whether or not a certain boy can look past everything else going on in Ashley's life and just like her.