Wednesday, 30 June 2010

Review: The Golem’s Eye by Jonathan Stroud



The review of “The Amulet of Samarkand”, the first part of this series, can be found here;

SPOILER WARNING

If you haven’t read the first part of this series yet and you value highly an unspoiled reading experience, it would be advisable to put off the lecture of this review as it contains several spoilers concerning the Amulet of Samarkand’s plot. I tried to limit them as much as possible but I had to mention some facts, notably the ending, in order to keep the synopsis logical and coherent.


It is said time and again that an opposition party and the same opposition party which has just won the election are two different things altogether. I suppose this remark is equally pertinent when it comes to people : if an underdog becomes a successful hero he/she must and should change. In what direction will the change go, though?

Synopsis

More than two years had passed since the rebellion of Simon Lovelace, prevented by Bartimaeus and Nathaniel. Our hero is now known solely as John Mandrake (his birth-name must be kept secret literally from everybody, friend or foe; in fact, apart from Nathaniel himself, only Bartimaeus knows it but he is in the Other Place). Instead of an undervalued, mistreated weedy boy of twelve we see suddenly a successful young man of almost fifteen, apprenticed to one of the most powerful magicians in the country, a prominent member of the government, Ms Jessica Whitwell. We had glimpsed this lady shortly in the previous book, torturing poor Bartimaeus in the Tower of London. She looks mighty like Cruella DeVill but she is far cleverer and definitely tougher. Her new apprentice tries to match her - Nathaniel is now fashionably dressed and lives in her spacious apartment near the Westminster enjoying such fantastic amenities as a walk-in wardrobe and a bathroom en-suite (swoon! I had to mention it! it was written by a guy about a teen boy!). He also becomes rather arrogant and full of himself. Small wonder, even the Prime Minister, Rupert Devereaux, is personally interested in his career (Nathaniel saved his life after all). Having received a stipend from the government, our protagonist was also employed in the Department of Internal Affairs, led by Ms Whitwell, and it is not a sinecure, far from it. Clearly Nathaniel has been earmarked for top jobs in the future. He is climbing the social ladder at great speed.

Not everything is exactly rosy, though. Nathaniel swiftly discovers that he has been transferred to an even more hostile environment than the household of his previous master - many magicians and apprentices hate him simply because they are deeply jealous of his privileged position and talent (no surprises here). He must watch his back (or make others watch it) constantly. Among such people he can’t make true friends – he has to deal with either temporary allies, more or less willing, or sworn enemies, more or less overt. That’s why he is missing his old pal Bartimaeus more and more with every passing day (he had to dismiss the djinn right after the demise of Lovelace, such had been their mutual agreement). True, he can have other magical entities at his disposal now but they are neither as intelligent nor as straightforward and truthful as his old companion. What’s more, Nathaniel still must produce outstanding results in order not to change from a rising star into a short-lived meteor. This time the task might seem a bit easier –  uncovering and eliminating an elusive group of Commoners, mostly children or teenagers, called the Resistance.
He had met them before and even has had a score to settle with them as they had mugged him, taking the last keepsake of his previous life, his hand-made scrying mirror. In this book, we get to know the Resistance a lot better. This small but efficient organization, led by a girl called Kitty Jones and an elderly man called Mr. Pennyfeather, is a group of people who had been hurt, neglected and/or injured by magicians, usually without any valid reason. Some of them had tried (and failed) to find justice in courts. As a result, they had got an awfully big grudge against the establishment; they don’t believe in the system anymore and some of them are immune to different forms of magic. It is, by the way, a perfect example how any dictatorship might create really formidable enemies just being too self-important to notice big tragedies of small folk. DIY foes, nothing less. On the other hand, it is also a showcase how your morale must deteriorate when you get too accustomed to committing crimes day in day out.

As the pressure mounts, Nathaniel becomes even more distracted by a series of terrifying attacks on the capital, performed by a very powerful being. Now everyone expects him, the golden boy, to solve the imbroglio and save the day; however, with enemies and traitors around, it certainly won’t be easy. Time to summon Bartimaeus again but will he be really happy, seeing this new Nathaniel, so similar in some aspects to his old nemesis Simon Lovelace?

What I liked:

The second part of this series I liked even better than the first. The introduction of Kitty and other Resistance people with their personal histories was a perfect addition to the plot, making the whole story more touching and believable. Mechanisms of power, described by Stroud, are dark, ruthless and tantalizing, in short taken straight from our political life - really something I enjoyed and appreciated as an adult reader. After all, nobody said children’s books must be dull and syrupy sweet. We also witness a dynamic development of the character of Nathaniel/John Mandrake and the Resistance members as well; although, from time to time we might not be sure whether to love or to hate them.

What I didn’t like:

Not enough of Bartimaeus (but it will change in the last book) and too many mediocre spiritual entities instead (with one prominent exception). Sure, those foliots and imps are funny but already their tricks have become a bit repetitive.

The final verdict:

A fantastic read. Witty, intelligent, lively.

Wishful Wednesday June 30

This wishful Wednesday I would like to present a book by Abraham Verghese "Cutting for Stone".

A short review:
"Beginning in India, the story progresses to Africa where it remains until the protagonist immigrates to America. Marion, the narrator of this fictional autobiography, is one of a set of identical twins. His birth and life at the mission, Missing, provide the basis for the conflicts and triumphs contained in the novel. The historical backdrop, Ethiopia's internal conflicts and coups, impart additional depth to the book's realistic atmosphere. The title "Cutting for Stone" is taken from the Hippocratic oath, but may also reflect a double meaning. The biological father of the Marion and his twin, Shiva, is Thomas Stone, a famous surgeon. In what may be a subconscious effort to emulate and impress their absent parent, both become skilled surgeons. They are "Cutting for Stone".

Tuesday, 29 June 2010

Tuesday Teaser


 
Teaser Tuesday is hosted by Should be Reading:

I would like to quote from the Amulet of Samarkand by Jonathan Stroud, p. 279, reviewed by me not so long ago:

" 'Nasty, ain't it?' The imp's voice dripped with satisfaction. 'Being at someone else's mercy. Now you know what it feels like. Face it, kid- you're on your own. You've got no one there to help you.'

Something tapped on the skylight window."

Sunday, 27 June 2010

Review: The Amulet of Samarkand by Jonathan Stroud


The Amulet of Samarkand by Jonathan Stroud

Continuing my reviews of book appropriate for summer fun and lounging in the sun (but not only), I would like to present  the first part of the Bartimaeus trilogy. Reading the blurb you might think it’s just another clone of Harry Potter series. I am happy to announce at once that nothing could be further from the truth.

Firstly, the magical community, invented by Mr. Stroud, is definitely a  more mature and dangerous world. There are no schools of magic and wizards are rather made than born. It works like this: some children aged five are freely given up by their parents to follow the magical training. They come from all walks of life. For their parents it means a large sum of money as compensation; small wonder there are always willing volunteers and the ads in newspapers provide even more encouragement. For children it means leaving their biological family forever, hiding, (at best - totaly forgetting) their real birth-name for security reasons, undergoing a series of tests and finally being allocated to the house of an adult wizard or witch who usually becomes their master or mistress for the rest of their training period. At twelve, the symbolic coming of age, they are allowed to choose a new name by which they will be known as a magician and a man (or woman). In return, they get a chance of becoming a member of the ruling class, living in relative comfort, maybe even making a brilliant career providing they are gifted and ruthless enough. 
Secondly, it is the duty of every witch and wizard to train an apprentice every now and then. Witches and wizards don’t have any children of their own as it used to have disastrous effects in the past, leading to competing dynasties and blood feuds. No exceptions. In fact, even without children they constitute a bunch of ambitious, mean, backstabbing careerists, only waiting around for any mistake of their colleagues – a typical pack of wolves. They don’t trust each other but they distrust the entities enslaved by them, their sources of power and glory, even more vehemently. It’s a constant tug-of-war - who will outwit whom. Magicians win most of time but sometimes they die (get eaten or dismembered or both). 
Finally Stroud introduces the fascinating workings of the 'seven planes' of spiritual world (magicians can see three of them only with special spectacles), the pecking order of magical beings, and the requirements of various spells and enchantments — plus the intrigue behind a group of non-magical commoners known as the Resistance.

Synopsis

The book starts with the presentation of the spiritual side of magic: the entities which enable wizards to perform the tricks of their trade. We meet one representative of these powers as we are ushered into a room where the temperature plunges dramatically, icicles form on the curtains and ceiling, and the scent of brimstone fills the air. Suddenly, the narrator reveals itself as the old and powerful djinn Bartimaeus, appearing in front of  a 10-year-old  apprentice, who has summoned him secretively in his room. The boy is called Nathaniel (but the djinn doesn’t know his name yet) and he lives in the household of a Junior Minister, Arthur Underwood; Nathaniel commands Bartimaeus to steal the Amulet of Samarkand from a hotshot upstart, Simon Lovelace as he nurses a grudge against him. Some time ago Lovelace, paying Underwood a visit, ruthlessly humiliated his apprentice in front of everyone present in the room, including one of the boy’s favourite teachers. Although officially masters are supposed to protect and defend their apprentices Arthur failed to do so, clearly afraid of the influential opponent. To add insult to injury he also punished the boy for trying to stand up to an adult, stronger wizard and endangering his position in the ministry. Outraged Nathaniel, a rather ambitious and  highly gifted pupil, decides to kick up secretly his magical training using books from his master’s library and pay Lovelace back. Summoning Bartimaeus is a part of his plan. However, the revenge backfires as the boy clearly has bitten more than he can chew. It's true that Bartimaeus proves to be more than up to the task set by his young master, but the act of stealing a powerful magical object sets in motion a lot of unpredicted events, catching Nathaniel and the djinn in a whirlwind of espionage, blackmail, murder, and finally a revolt. Apart from that, Nathaniel finds out that summoning beings as old and devious as Bartimaeus is one thing and controlling them is quite another. Will he be able to cooperate with the recalcitrant djinn and punish Lovelace for the committed crimes? Will his master help him?

What I liked:

The magical world created in this trilogy has a truly original touch - finally we see not only wizards performing awesome deeds but we are also informed about the source of their magic and its inner workings. You can even find here some subtle satire on real political parties and politicians. The whole storyline is also darker and edgier than other similar fare, remaining humorous and entertaining at the same time. The character of Bartimaeus is a powerful creation, sometimes even overshadowing poor Nathaniel and his fellow wizards and I must add we got  a very talkative and intelligent djinn – the footnotes of his chapters are one the most hilarious parts of the book!

What I didn’t like:

Sometimes the plot was too predictable. Fortunately not very often. It’s a children’s book after all!


The final verdict:

A highly addictive stuff - if you start reading the first part, you will want to read the rest for sure. Luckily the whole trilogy is available on the market so we don’t have to wait for ages for another installment. It would be unbearable, even though there are no cliffhanger endings here.


Saturday, 26 June 2010

Friday, 25 June 2010

Review: Grasshopper by Barbara Vine

Grasshopper by Barbara Vine

If you know that under the nom de plume of Barbara Vine is hidden Ruth Rendell, the bestselling crime novelist, you will think immediately: psychological thriller. Quite correct but it is not a typical mystery. This book is also a first person narration about how much you must change in your life in order to restore your inner peace after a very traumatic event.The horror here isn't evil. It's disastrous consequences committed by people with the best intentions.

The narrator and the main character is, very characteristically for this author, a young woman. Clodagh Brown was involved in a serious accident while still attenting a secondary school. She and her boyfriend, Daniel, used to climb electricity pylons and one time they became too cocky and their luck ran out - Daniel died from electric shock. He was younger than Clodagh and, as the girl managed to survive, plenty of people started to blame her for the boy’s death, her parents among them. An older girlfriend should have known better than climbing a transmission tower, dragging poor, innocent boy behind, right?

What do parents normally do when the child doesn’t meet their expectations? Either they try to help him/her or they try to send him/her away and banish from their life. Clodagh's parents tried both methods and finally their daughter was sent away to London, officially to go to GUP but it was evident that mom and dad started to perceive her case as hopeless and wanted to get her out of sight. Officially her situation was a bed of roses. She was properly taken care of as she went to live with Max and Selina, her relatives, who offered a nice basement flat under their own without any charge. It was like another punishment for claustrophobic Clodagh, though. Her college course didn’t seem interesting enough to keep her occupied and the route to the University, with several subterranean passages or the necessity of taking the Tube, was like a hellish nightmare. One day, in the middle of her claustrophobic crisis she met a boy called Silver. He and Clodagh fell in love, and both became intrepid midnight roof climbers.


Sliver, whose parents were very rich, happened to be Max and Selina’s neighbour - he had a loft of his own on the same street. His flat became a favourite haunt for a bunch of very miscellaneous misfits who had been climbing the roofs of London’s terraced houses with him for some time. The group became more and more colourful and conflicted, consisting of Wim, a secretive and very handsome Dutch of mixed racial origin, Liv, a mentally unstable Swedish nanny on the run from her host family, Johnny, an amoral criminal and a bully who used to be Liv’s boyfriend, and some other girls and boys, taking advantage of Silver’s incredible generosity and naïvety. Soon climbing roofs and hanging out with Silver would become not only Clodagh’ favourite pastime but also the only thing she truly loved doing in London. The girl didn’t realize that once again she was on the verge of being involved in a crime story and once again it wasn't her fault but she had to face the consequences.

One evening Clodagh and Silver discover a hidden location of a pair of  fugitives. They are thrilled but the pair, hiding in an empty flat with the child they were accused of kidnapping, is less than happy - harassed by tabloids they are at the end of their tether. Clodagh and Silver decide to help them but doing so they must break the law and rely on Johnny, the only person with criminal experience and contacts. It gives the plot a huge and unexpected twist and it leads to truly dramatic ending, definitely not happy for some of the characters mentioned above.

What I liked:

I love this multi-layered style of narration - at the beginning this book doesn't really have one main story line, but multiple threads, without a central conclusion. After a while they connect with each other and all of them lead to the grand finale of a kind. I must admit every detail, every character in this book has been very well though-out and the whole structure resembles to a work of architecture or a piece of classical music, with no unnecessary part or adornment. The story is gripping, full of surprises and twists. You will never get bored till the very end.The fact that it wasn't a classic "whodunnit" didn't put me off at all.

What I didn’t like:

At some point, somewhere in the middle of the book, I thought there were too many details and characters brought into focus but after a moment it all worked just fine. Really fine.

The final verdict:

One of my favourite books to read during the summer – a novel I feel like returning to.

Wednesday, 23 June 2010

Thoughtful Thursday - sanity day!


One of the definitions of sanity is the ability to tell real from unreal. Soon we'll need a new definition.
Alvin Toffler

I became insane, with long intervals of horrible sanity.
Edgar Allan Poe 

Sanity calms, but madness is more interesting.
John Russell

Sanity is madness put to good use.
George Santayana

I know the topic might be a bit heavy but who is to say we can't handle it? It's all about our brains...

Do you agree with the quotes I chose and posted above? Which ones? Why? What does it really mean to be sane? Do geniuses are just mentally ill people whith outrageous ideas which somehow happen to turn right? Do you need to/must be sane to write good books? Why so many people nowadays, although officially completely sane, according to A.Toffler have serious problems with telling the real from unreal?