Review: A Kiss for Midwinter by Courtney Milan

Form: e-book, mobi format

Genre: historical romance
Target audience: adults
Series: Brothers Sinister Holiday Novella

I got this one from Rameau as a gift - thank you very much my dear! I hope you won't regret it! ;p

Synopsis (from Goodreads)

Miss Lydia Charingford is always cheerful, and never more so than at Christmas time. But no matter how hard she smiles, she can't forget the youthful mistake that could have ruined her reputation. Even though the worst of her indiscretion was kept secret, one other person knows the truth of those dark days: the sarcastic Doctor Jonas Grantham. She wants nothing to do with him...or the butterflies that take flight in her stomach every time he looks her way.

Jonas Grantham has a secret, too: He's been in love with Lydia for more than a year. This winter, he's determined to conquer her dislike and win her for his own. It all starts with a wager and a kiss...

My impressions:

I usually have my issues with novellas and this one was no exception. Still the problems I encountered here ran deeper than my usual ' it was too short' carping. For a novella it was actually quite substantial but this time I didn't relate to the main characters and the whole premise as well. Proving once again that I am not a great romance fan. Oh well.

First of all I admit I liked how Ms Milan presented our good doctor - a cynical young man with few inhibitions concerning conversational topics in polite company.  I do regret he wasn't allowed to tell one of his famous gonorrhoea jokes, though. One thing about him surprised me a bit: he was so strangely altruistic, never even enquiring about a dowry, just looking for a pretty face. I would understand if he was a son of an aristocrat or a rich squire; however why a son of a scrap metal shop owner didn't want to get a bit richer, pocketing several hundred pounds with a bride, as almost any gent wanted to do at that era, was a bit puzzling... it seemed that Ms Milan forgot that she was writing about a self-made little town doctor, not one of those dukes. Oh well, I could survive that.  Especially that I also was impressed by the author's research concerning the Victorian medicine problems and how it was included in the plot. However Miss Lydia was one big dark spot in this overall cheery Yule romance picture and pray, tell me, how to like a book which heroine doesn't appeal to you?

If you read The Duchess War (reviewed by me here), the first full-length novel of this series, you will already know a lot about Lydia - she was the sidekick of Minnie, the main female lead. I didn't like her there and, unfortunately, the novella wasn't able to change my mind.

Lydia is your average bland, smiling miss who can see advantages of every situation and is cloying and  cheery even though, theoretically at least, she has had little luck in her short life - such is the premise which, I suppose, was to emphasize the steely core of that young woman.

 It didn't persuade me, not for a moment.

 You see, Lydia was seduced at the tender age of 15 (not a big spoiler) and abandoned, pregnant, by her dishonest lover. Then she miscarried but her family was able to hide that fact because they had already managed to go away with her to Cornwall. Lydia returned, regained her health and...nothing worse happened. Her loving parents allowed her to continue living in the relative safety and comfort of her family home, supporting her admirably at every turn.  She could attend church and social gatherings, she had friends, her reputation remained practically intact.  Even the fact that Lydia's child was born prematurely and died, a very painful experience indeed, in the long term was very convenient as it helped her to keep up appearances. All rosy and nice - so where is the hardship and grit? Where are the obstacles to overcome? Where is the admirable show of an exquisite strength of the character? Imagine just for a moment what would happen if Lydia actually had that child and was thrown out of the house by her irate parents, all on her own, without any means to support herself... 

Oh wait, there were psychological scars as well - our Lydia hated when someboy called her 'darling'  because that's what her first lover used to say. She was also a bit distrustful when it came to gentlemen (small wonder) but, on the other hand, she  missed sexual intercourse and, for obvious reasons, she was very unlikely to indulge herself outside of the wedlock. Ok here we get the tension. Add to that the fact that doctor Grantham as a young student paid her a professional visit with his mentor so he knew about her past. Now whenever he looks at her Lydia thinks he is judging and criticising her mistake and naivete whereas he is just admiring her face and wits. Sweet but somehow I found it lacking.

My final remark: doctor Grantham falls in love with Lydia just because she tells him 'no way, not me, find another girl'. Perhaps some obstinate young men do like overcoming such obstacles just for the glory of winning with a difficult opponent but eight out of ten eligible, sexually starved bachelors would indeed go and find another mark - prettier, richer and more willing. Here you go. I managed to write a whole essay about a novella. Perhaps it wasn't so bad after all?

Final verdict:

I think I could live without finding out more  about the love life of Miss Lydia and doctor Grantham. I do not regret reading this one, from time to time it was fun, but overall hardly different from other cute Yule romance novels. Which is not a compliment in my mouth. 

Movie review: Lord of War by Andrew Niccol

Directed and written by Andrew Niccol
Cast:
Yuri Orlov: Nicolas Cage
Vitaly Orlov: Jared Leto
Simeon Weisz (Yuri's main rival): Ian Holm 
Ava Fontaine (wife of Yuri): Bridget Moynahan
Jack Valentine (Interpol agent): Ethan Hawke
Date of release: 2005

Synopsis:

Meet Yuri Orlov- an ambitious son of  Ukrainian immigrants living in the USA. He wants to escape the banal life of New York's Little Odessa and his father's pseudo-Jewish, little restaurant, serving borscht and latkes. He thinks his future will change for the better if he enters the right business. Still all the legal  career opportunities disapoint him heavily - they don't give him a chance to become successful and rich fast. Then, after witnessing a brutal gang warfare murder, he finds his vocation - selling arms. After all human beings will always have a need for people who sell guns, like they need doctors and morticians, right? Every twelfth person on Earth owns  a gun of a kind, Yuri's ambition is to arm the other eleven as well. How very egalitarian of him ;p.

 His new profession of an illegal arms dealer takes him to the hyper-violent war zones of West Africa, the real "edge of Hell". His best customer is one of sociopathic dictators who employ children soldiers and torture people on a whim. While Yuri is not doging bullets and Interpol agents he is laundering his money, investing in legal businesses, buying himself a multimilion dollar Manhattan condo and a fashion model wife he's always had a crush on. He feels he deserves it for all the danger and trouble. Yes, his hands are stained but who can boast of a clean pair of these in any business?

Anyway Yuri's transition between the two worlds is seamless, as is the ethical compartmentalization that allows him to exist comfortably in both: "Cars and cigarettes kill more people than guns," "I simply give people the means to defend themselves," "The gun itself won't kill anybody" - these are elements of his everyday mantra. However slowly the corrosive depravity of Yuri's vocation eats away at this bifurcated morality and he and his more sensitive brother succumb to the vices that his weapon sales indirectly cultivate - prostitution, drug addiction, corruption and murder. Still he becomes influential and rich - richer than he'd ever dreamt. Will he leave his chosen profession now for something more palatable? Will he keep endangering his more and more anxious wife, little son and drug-addicted younger brother?

My impressions:

This movie surprised me in a very positive way mainly because of Nicolas Cage and his great portrayal of the main lead. I admit it was truly inspired. Yuri shares with us his whole story, from his first experience with a gun sale through his monumental peak of the career, to his inevitable downfall. As he tells us at the beginning, he doesn’t try and sugar coat the story; he knows he’s not the best representative of the human race but still he doesn't feel guilty. He tried to break into the legal market of arms dealing but other, more important competitors, Simeon Weish among them, made it impossible. They forced Yuri to resort to black and, let's state it clearly, Yuri’s favorite, “gray” markets. Not his fault, right?

At one level, arms trade is an activity that lends itself perfectly to the big screen - big guns, lots of money, exotic places, shady characters, beautiful, expensive call girls in rare moments of rest and relaxation. But that's only half the story. Less sexy but more important are the dizzyingly complex administrative and bureaucratic arrangements made by traffickers to hide their activities and throw any law enforcement officials who can't be bribed or eliminated off the scent. Fraudulent end-user certificates, front companies, false bills of lading - all essential elements of the illicit arms trade but hardly the stuff of an enjoyable Friday night at the movies. Niccol manages to communicate these details while keeping his audience on the edge of their seats with the guns, money and shady characters. Let me describe one scene as an example.

Yuri and his brother Vitaly are approaching the Colombian coastal city of Cartagena with a boatload of AK-47 assault rifles. Yuri is conversing with his nacro-trafficker client about the "Angel Kings" he is going to deliver. Moments later, he receives a phone call from one of his plants in a Colombian intelligence agency who informs him that Interpol is hot on his trail. Yuri goes to work. He sends one of his crew members over the side of the ship with a can of paint and hasty orders to paint over the large, white "Kristol" inscription (the name of the ship). He then calls another paid spy who gives him the name of a clean Dutch ship, the "Kono," which he barks at the crew member on the hanging scaffold. Vitaly frantically searches their extensive collection of national flags for a Dutch flag, which, unfortunately, has gone missing. The camera pans to a rapidly approaching Interpol patrol boat. In the nick of time, Vitaly finds a French flag which, turned on its side, looks like the Dutch flag, and the anonymous crew member finishes repainting the side of the ship literally in the last possible moment. The Interpol patrol boat pulls up along side the newly renamed "Kono." Even though the name doesn't match the ship they are looking for, agent Jack Valentine decides to board the ship anyway and search it. He is greeted by Yuri, who shows him to the cargo hold while a cool voice-over by Cage explains how he conceals his merchandise: in boxes labeled "farm equipment," in canisters marked "radio active waste," and, his personal favorite, "the combination of week-old potatoes and tropical heat," which is what surprised Valentine finds in the cargo hold.

Through numerous scenes like that one, Niccol managed to construct a surprisingly nuanced and accurate portrayal of the illicit arms trade and people behind it, never veering towards a lachrymose story about human vices or a vacuous slapstick about a very serious issue. He never tries to moralize the viewer or force some simplistic solutions on you - an approach which is a huge asset and which I adore. Perhaps the first part of the movie is indeed a bit slower but then you are rewarded till the very end.

Final verdict:

 "Lord of War" is an edgy, intelligent, innovative and darkly humorous film which can appeal to lay audiences and policy analysts alike. I am not surprised it was officially endorsed by the human rights group Amnesty International for highlighting the arms trafficking by the international arms industry and individuals alike.

Quotes I found interesting (for those undecided, doubting souls ;p):

"Without operations like mine it would be impossible for certain countries to conduct a respectable war. I was able to navigate around those inconvenient little arms embargoes. There are three basic types of arms deal: white, being legal, black, being illegal, and my personal favorite color, *gray*. Sometimes I made the deal so convoluted, it was hard for *me* to work out if they were on the level."

"I sell to leftists, and rightists. I sell to pacifists, but they're not the most regular customers. Of course, you're not a *true* internationalist until you've supplied weapons to kill your *own* countrymen. "

"Every faction in Africa calls themselves by these noble names - Liberation this, Patriotic that, Democratic Republic of something-or-other... I guess they can't own up to what they usually are: the Federation of Worse Oppressors Than the Last Bunch of Oppressors. Often, the most barbaric atrocities occur when both combatants proclaim themselves Freedom Fighters. "

"After the Cold War, the AK-47 became Russia's biggest export. After that came vodka, caviar, and suicidal novelists."

"Some of the most successful relationships are based on lies and deceit. Since that's where they usually end up anyway, it's a logical place to start. "

"You know who's going to inherit the Earth? Arms dealers. Because everyone else is too busy killing each other. That's the secret to survival. Never go to war. Especially with yourself. "

Silent Saturday - Winter Landscape with Iceskaters by Hendrick Avercamp

One of the reasons why I adore  Dutch Golden Age landscapes and cityscapes :)
Click to enlarge.

Here you go. Just for you, Heidenkind!

Review: The Duchess War by Courtney Milan (Brothers Sinister 01)

Book info:
Form: pdf
Genre: historical romance 
Target audience: adults

Synopsis:

Once upon a time there was a girl who resembled a mouse. She was small and quiet, her hair was dark blond or light brown – in short mousy – she had no wealth or great education, she had no family, she had to scrape a living. Still she had brains and it was one of her most important secrets. When she fell in love, it all became a game for her, a game she wanted to win at all cost because it was one of those opportunities which shouldn't have happened. Not to her anyway.

If you ever watched a mouse you would know that little rodent can be surprisingly fast, resourceful and clever. Calling somebody a mouse is, in fact, a compliment. Some mice outsmart cats. Our heroine – Wilhelmina Pursling or Minevra Lane, depending on who was asking – certainly was determined to outsmart somebody far stronger and more formidable than herself. Her opponent was Robert Blaisdell Duke of Clermont a handsome, rich and  influential young man every lady of the ton would desire to catch, if not for herself then for her daughter. A man who knew nothing about tactics or chess. A man who was supposed to think that women are just empty, spoiled dolls to be dressed up or down and displayed in a ballroom or in a bedroom.

“I’m winning,” he announced. “You can’t bore me into a surrender.”

“You probably think battles are won with cannons and brave speeches

and fearless charges.” She smoothed her skirts as she spoke. “They’re not.

Wars are won by dint of having adequate shoe leather. They’re won by

boys who make shells in munitions factories, by supply trains shielded

from enemy eyes. Wars are won by careful attendance to boring detail. If

you wait to see the cavalry charge, Your Grace, you’ll have already lost.”

He blinked. “You’re trying to make me back down. It won’t work.”

So he defies Minnie’s careful, bland plans. He brings his friends and tries to defend himself better. If you can’t win you should call a truce – always a better option than losing, right?

What I liked:

An aristocrat and a nobody…there are so many romance novels with such a pair of characters. He is usually a duke or a count, she is your ordinary miss from the country with shadows in her past. The male lead is made into a kind of a rake, a drunk or a gambler – until he falls in love with the right girl of course. She in turn is more often than not somebody in dire need of a strong male arm and quid, a biddable, quiet person; perhaps not exactly stupid, with a sense of humour even, but also not especially intrepid or clever. How very cliché. However the novel by Milan is always different.

Robert Alan Graydon Blaisdell the Duke of Clermont is a man with a mission – he wants to prove that he is better than his late father. He doesn’t gamble, he doesn’t drink, he doesn’t whore, he wants to make amends to those who have been hurt by his unscrupulous parent. He befriends his half brother born of rape and a cousin with a scientific mind and a great sense of humour. He visits spinning mills and wants to improve the living conditions of the working class. Not your ordinary romance hero, right?

Minnie is poor and has very few choices available but she makes use of her brain and strives to find the right path, thinking about the future of those she loves and cares for. She takes a lot of risky decision hoping one of them might be the right one. She is a chess player and a strategist even when she doesn’t play chess anymore.

Robert and Minnie both had horrible fathers who tried to exploit them mercilessly. Will they be able to trust each other? It is, I suppose, the main issue between them – lack of trust, weak attempts at breaking the protecting barriers which were supposed to shelter them from the outside world and in fact, imprisoned them. Robert doesn’t believe somebody might actually love him without strings attached. Minnie cannot believe she might be worth something at all, because after her childhood drama she became ‘nothing’. Even after their marriage (and it is not difficult to guess they will marry) they must overcome their demons together which was kind of sweet.

Also some secondary characters, like Robert's mom, Sebastian Malheur and Violet were a joy to meet. I am looking forward to reading about them more in the next installments!


What I didn’t like:

It was a story written by Courtney Milan and yet, and yet… it wasn’t completely faultless. I think my expectations were set too high mainly due to the previous novels, some of them really excellent. Don’t get me wrong, it was still a great historical romance book but I really missed that clever strategy promised on the cover, a more convoluted plot, like a good game of chess. I expected Minnie to think more before she acted, to plan before she took a decision. She was at war but she behaved more like a befuddled conscript soldier than a general. I missed chess terms as well – after all our heroine was supposed to be somebody like an international chess master and a child prodigy too so it would be natural for her to think using a chess board and terms involved with that game. Instead too often she thought like your ordinary country miss, without entering those boring details she talked about at the beginning (see my quote above). Those close to her also have difficulties with realizing that Minnie deserves something better, really unnerving. Her great-aunt says:

 “Men look for many kinds of wives,” Eliza finally said. “Pretty,

vivacious wives. Wealthy, indulgent ones. Highborn, prideful ladies.” She

bit her lip. “I don’t want you hurt, Minnie. But it is my duty to make you

face the truth. Nobody is looking for a shy, clever girl whose father died

halfway through his sentence of hard labor.”

Minnie’s friend, Lydia, annoyed me a bit, being just a bland sidekick with (nothing new, really) trust issues and just one good scene, involving several glasses of punch. Overall there was not enough funny, cynical moments which made the previous novels so enjoyable (still shortening Wilhelmina to Hell did crack me up!).

Final verdict:

The Duchess War was a good novel, highly readable and fun but, in my humble opinion, not the best Milan book I’ve ever read. I am still a fan and I'm looking forward to reading the rest of the series (this one is the first and there is a prequel available as well) hoping that the next ones will be better - I know they can be so. Like Unraveled and Unclaimed which I adored to no end. Of course as far as a romance novel can be adored by me. ;p

Review: My Sore Hush-a-Bye by Renata F. Barcelos

Book info:
Form:pdf
Genre: psychological fiction
Target audience: adults and older teenagers

A copy of this novel for reviewing purposes was sent to me free of charge by the author  - thank you very much Renata for being so patient with me !  That fact, of course,  didn't influence my review in any way. 

Synopsis:

Camille Marie Jones seems to be just your average, shy, dark-skinned teenager who lives with her uncle Bob and have problems with bullies at school. Still the more you get to know her the more you think something is wrong with her and uncle Bob and all their little happy home. Why Bob never lets Camille go and play with her peers? Why they never watch news, just old, black-and-white movies? Why they listen only to old songs of David Bowie and Mama Cass?  Why he gives her a bath although she is approaching maturity?

One of few Camille shcool friends, Ashley, disappears. Camille thinks she knows what happened to the girl but she doesn't want to tell anybody because it would mean the end of her little world. However the end is approaching soon anyway - uncle Bob has procured a new girl called Giselle and is spending more and more time with her. Camille feels unwanted, jealous and old. Yes, you read it right - OLD. Out of sheer depair she does something unthinkable - she phones her mum - and all the hell breaks loose.

What I liked:

It was a novel told in the first person limited narrative voice which sent shivers down my spine. Camille was such a shy, sweet girl, somebody who deserved something better than a false household with a creepy uncle. From the very beginning I felt uneasy reading about their relationship and I was right.

Still the best feature of this book was the psychological construction of the main character. I don't know whether Ms Barcelos is a psychologist but if she is not, she is clearly somebody gifted in this area. Camille's reactions and thoughts were so incredibly right that from time to time I felt as if I read a report of a real person, describing real events. It was weird but in a positive way. It made me curious and I found the novel very readable, finishing it during one evening.

Uncle Bob was also a three-dimensional character, a baddie I would love to meet more often in fiction (not in real time though, really creepy).

 What I didn't like:

I admit that sometimes the narration was flowing too slow for my liking but these were only short fragments. I think it would be better if the author decided to add another narrative voice (the whole novel is rather short so it would be perfectly doable) - that of uncle Bob or Ashley, Camille's friend, making the book more complex.

Final verdict:

A very good psychological novel about physical and psychological abuse. Incredible characterization and a great story!!! Thank you for the opportunity to read and review it!

Review: Dope by Sara Gran

Book info:

Genre: crime story noir/thriller

Target audience: adults

Form: pdf

Synopsis:

1950s, New York City, light ages before the famous ‘no tolerance’ policy of Mayor Giuliani. Josephine Flannigan, 36,  tries to make her living as a former heroin addict. She is a skilled con artist, a shrewd shoplifter and, generally, whatever anybody wants her to be providing they pay cash. She doesn’t do drugs and she doesn’t sell herself, anything else is negotiable. She must be clever and flexible - in such a seedy, dangerous, crime-ridden city she is lucky she’s survived to her third decade at all. As she hasn’t been shooting up for two years she looks ‘great’, with shiny hair, clearer complexion and a more rounded figure. Still paying her rent every single month is a challenge – she has no education and no steady position so money is tight; occasional odd jobs (like stealing a ring at Tiffany for breakfast ;p ) are hardly very profitable, fences never pay you much - the competition is too fierce.

Fortunately one of her ‘friends’ recommends Joe’s skills to the Nelsons, a respectable suburban couple. Their eighteen-year old daughter, Nadine, has abruptly disappeared with a wrong kind of boyfriend. Josephine recognized him instantly with a shudder as a ruthless pimp and a drug dealer called Jerry McFall. As Nadine has been a drug fiend for some time now (that’s why she dropped out of Barnard College) it seems Joey is the best person to find her, far better than any police officer of a PI – after all she knows that milieu like the back of her hand. What’s more the anxious parents offer her $1,000 upfront and then another thousand if she brings Nadine home in one piece. A sweet deal and easy buck? Not really.

Josephine embarks on an odyssey through New York’s underworld which is a bit like a sentimental but a very dangerous journey to her – she reconnects with many of her old friends and must constantly fight off the temptation to return to drugs. After a while she starts to care about the absent girl in spite of herself, maybe because the girl is as vulnerable as herself and maybe because Joe misses her younger sister, Shelley. Shelley, now a popular ads model and a budding actress, managed to make a stunning career considering her background, mainly because of Joe’s devotion and support; however, she doesn’t need the older sister anymore and she is even ashamed of her. Let’s face it, she aspires to be upper class and a former prostitute and drug addict of a sister not exactly helps that image. Business is business.

 Will Josephine be able to find Nadine on time to prevent the worst? Will the money be worth her efforts? Or maybe it is not such a great chance at all and somebody is simply framing her for murder? You know that old saying: if something looks or sounds too good it is most likely too good to be true…

What I liked:

There is nothing romanticized about the story you get in this novel and its heroine, mauled by her sad experience. The slums are not just providing a colourful background – they are described with gritty vividness, really the worst places to visit, full of brutal, despairing, desolate people who see no end of their problems and have no future. Josephine is not a princess who managed to come unscathed from hell, quite the opposite in fact; as the narrator she honestly admits from the beginning that she has been leading horrible life since her childhood with alcoholic, unstable mother and a younger sister to feed and protect from the worst.

Raised rough in Hell’s Kitchen, Josephine never expected much from life. She has scraped by, pulling small cons, shoplifting, whoring when times were particularly bad— then doing just about anything to get enough for her next fix. Still she never feels sorry for herself and the way she treats her sister, now apparently doing much better than poor Joe has ever done, is very touching. Almost as touching as Joe’s heroic efforts to find a rich brat from a ‘good’ house even when it is obvious nobody really cares what’s happened to Nadine. Making Josephine persevere the author showed that her heroine really deserved better than being labeled 'white trash'. It is even more impressing that at first Joe admits her annoyance at Nadine, a girl who had every advantage like a loving family and money, and managed to screw up her life royally just for fun. She says chillingly:

“She wanted her walk on the wild side and now she was getting it. So let her see what The Life was like. Let her lose her looks from getting hit in the face too many times . Let her lose a few teeth and all of her pride and all her charm school manners. Her college education wouldn't do her any good out here.”

 It really takes a lot of backbone and character integrity to keep looking for and helping somebody you’ve envied so much; such qualities made Joey a compelling character and it was really shown, not told.

Now about the style. Sara Gran writes with a lot of reserve which only adds force to her narration. There are no infodumps or boring fragments in this novel – with every new person Josephine encounters on her path there is the promise of a whole new interesting story just waiting to be told to a willing listener. There are no redundant secondary characters either. The baddie is really bad – a female boxer and a pimp plus a crooked drug dealer, is there anything better for your negative character…I mean anything worse? There is another baddie, as ugly as Jerry but I can say no more, it would be a major spoiler.

What I didn’t like:

The ending. I wanted a HEA for Josephine very badly but, unfortunately, the author decided otherwise – she  suggested a much more real but pretty painful outcome. Still a suggestion is not a fact, right? I would love to read a sequel in which Joey has a bit more luck and finds her much-deserved stability, maybe even happiness.

Final verdict:

One of better noir mystery novels I’ve read this year with a funny, intelligent heroine and interesting settings. Still it is definitely not a novel for somebody who likes happy endings – be warned, the final several pages are pretty heart-rending in a dark, brutal way.

Movie review: Inception directed by Christopher Nolan

I was reminded about this movie by Heidenkind - go and check the rest of her non-holiday movies list - thanks a lot! I owe you again!

Release year: 2010

Written by Christopher Nolan

Genre: sci-fi thriller

Cast:

Dom Cobb: Leonardo di Caprio

Arthur: Joseph Gordon-Levitt

Ariadne: Ellen Page

Mallorie "Mal" Cobb - Marion Cotillard

Saito - Ken Watanabe
Robert Fisher - Cillian Murphy

Synopsis:

Where is the safest place for your secrets? If you say ‘in my own head’ this movie can actually make you change your mind.

Cover of Inception

Dom Cobb is a skilled extractor – a thief who can navigate people’s mind in their sleep and find out the secrets they are hiding while sharing their dream. Sometimes he must create a dream within a dream to reach the information he needs and with every layer of the sleep the whole process gets trickier. Still he is one of the best and he works with a team of other professionals, called architects. Architects are responsible for creating the right scenery of a given dream, designing it from scratch. Every single detail of fictional reality must be in perfect accordance with the locations known to their victims. Cobb and his colleagues earn a lot of money, being usually hired by powerful corporations and super-rich tycoons; still because of that not exactly lawful profession Cobb has also plenty of enemies and can’t return home to live with his two children - in America he is a fugitive from justice, officially accused of murdering his wife, Mal.

Penrose stairs are incorporated into the film as an example of the impossible objects that can be created in lucid dream worlds.

One of his victims, a very wealthy businessman called Saito, after an almost-successful session of dream-sharing and stealing, makes Cobb an offer he cannot refuse. Using his influence Saito will make it possible for Cobb to return home, his criminal records wiped clean permanently, but in return Cobb must try something even more difficult than extraction, an inception. Inception is the exact opposite of what Cobb’s been doing – instead of stealing a secret from somebody’s mind you plant a new idea inside their brain. It is a very complex process - you need a lot of psychological skills and knowledge about your victim because if they don’t accept that idea as their own they will remove it from their head in no time. Some partners of Cobb actually think an inception is impossible but Cobb knows it can be done. In fact he did it once and it was so successful that  he has been regretting the results every single day ever since. Still, as he misses his children very much he decides to make a deal with Saito.

Saito wants Cobb to invade the mind of Robert Fisher who is soon going to heir his father’s empire, Fisher-Monroe energy conglomerate. Fisher-Monroe is the major rival of Saito’s corporation and they can no longer compete with it in successfully. Cobb is supposed to plant an idea of splitting up the company in the head of the young successor – no mean feat because it is the very move any sensible owner would oppose. How to make Robert accept such a notion? Is it possible at all? Saito and Cobb think so. After all subconscious is motivated by emotions not reason, right?

The 11-ring labyrinth at Chartres Cathedral

Now Dom has to create a new team - including a good forger and the best architect he can find. That’s how he meets Ariadne, an architecture student who is more gifted than himself when it comes to designing a dream. Her task will be creating labyrinths – the equivalents of every layer of their victim's  consciousness;  first she must be trained by Cobb how to navigate a dream. 

Ariadne proves to be a very intelligent, quick-learning pupil but also one who is seriously concerned about Cobb’s state of mind. Right after their first session of dream-sharing she realizes Cobb cannot design his own dreams anymore because his late wife keeps revisiting and destroying them and he cannot keep her out for a reason or two. Will that weak spot jeopardize his last and most important mission? Should people from his own team trust him? Can you be killed inside your dream? What happens when you choose not to return? If you are curious, you must watch this movie to the very end. ;p

What I liked:

I refused to watch this one for a very long time because of Leonardo Di Caprio. Yes, I don't like this actor but this time I was pleasantly surprised. He played decently well and he was given the main role in one of the most intelligent sci-fi movies I’ve seen for a long time, the lucky devil. I loved the theory behind dream-sharing, all these projections of your subconsciousness, and the fact that the deeper inside the dreamland you were the more  the time slowed down around you and the quicker your brain worked. It was an elegant solution. I also appreciated it that they didn’t forget about our natural defense mechanism - as soon as you realize somebody is messing with your dream your projections become aggressive, trying to eliminate the intruder from your brain.  After some training you can even arm your projections and hurt the invader. Of course being hurt in your dream doesn’t mean anything when you wake up but still you can feel the pain without any problem. And you never should recreate the places that really exist in your mind because it can stir your memories and lose the grasp between what’s real and what is a dream. Oh and you need a personal totem, something unique and heavy which will help you realize whether you are inside a dream or not. Nice isn’t it? I could talk about it forever.

I also loved all those Minotaur’s labyrinth analogies because the myth itself is compelling. It is evident that Cobb represents Theseus, the founder-king of Athens who volunteered to go to Crete in order to free his people from a bloody offering of seven young men and severn maidens made every 'Great' year (so every seven solar years) to appease Minotaur. Minotaur was a half-bull half-man, living in a labyrinth build by Daedal in Knossoss, the son of Queen Pasifae, sired by a bull sent by Poseidon as a revenge.

Reproduction fresco on reconstucted wall at Palace of Minos, Knossos, Crete. Some glass reflections present (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

After he ascended the throne of Crete, Minos competed with his brothers to rule. Minos prayed to Poseidon to send him a snow-white bull, as a sign of support. He was to kill the bull to show honor to Poseidon but decided to keep it instead because of its beauty. He thought Poseidon would not care if he kept the white bull and sacrificed one of his own, an inferior animal. To punish Minos, Aphrodite made Pasiphaë, Minos' wife, fall deeply in love with the bull from the sea.  Pasiphaë had the archetypal craftsman Daedalus make a hollow wooden cow, and climbed inside it in order to mate with the white bull. The offspring was the monstrous Minotaur.Everybody knew it was a madness sent by the Gods so neither the unhappy Queen nor her monster of a son were punished. Pasiphaë nursed him in his infancy, but he grew and became ferocious, being the unnatural offspring of man and beast, he had no natural source of nourishment and thus devoured man for sustenance. Minos, after getting advice from the oracle at Delphi, had Daedalus construct a gigantic labyrinth to hold the Minotaur. Its location was near Minos' palace in Knossos.

Mal, Cobb’s wife represents the beast itself, she is something created against your own will. Being dead, she is just a projection of her husband's mind. It means Cobb carries the beast inside his head – a feeling or an idea that he is guilty and he cannot pardon himself enough to let Mal go. While Theseus was just led by the thread of Ariadne (the princess never entered the labyrinth but she was the half-sister of the beast), Cobb is accompanied by Ariadne herself and she is the only one who questions his problems and forces him to fight them. Will he get his catharsis, though, while he leaves Ariadne behind? In the myth, while Theseus and the rest of the crew fell asleep on the beach Athena waked the prince and told him to leave early, leaving Ariadne and her sister, Phaedra, on the beach.  Stricken with distress, Theseus forgot to put up the white sails instead of the black ones, so his father committed suicide. It was explained that  Dionysus later saw Ariadne crying out for Theseus and took pity on her and married her.In the movie Ariadne never becomes romantically involved with Cobb but still she is the closest to him, understanding him much better than any other member of his team.

What I didn't like:

Only after watching the movie for the second time I noticed some ambiguities concerning the main plot. Why exactly Cobb couldn't invade the brain of some American prosecutors to make them fix his little law problem? He had the skills, he had the team...was it more difficult than revealing corporate secrets? Somehow I don't think so. Also the ending left me wondering: did he or didn't he succeed? Fortunately some Interned browsing later I managed to answer my own question. ALMOST.

Final verdict: 

An intelligent sci-fi movie without rubbery monsters or tons of blood and slime. It will entertain you and it will make you think. If you get bored in December watch it one evening - you won't regret it.

Ok, spoilers ahead - the section below should be read only by people who have actually seen the movie and they wonder: how it really ended?

Those of you who've seen the movie know that in the final scene, Cobb is reunited with his children. Or is he? Did that scene happen in real life or just in his dreams?

Speaking to Clothes on Film (yes, there is a site devoted to that topic), Jeffrey Kurland, Inception costume designer, revealed the following:

COF: How much does costume reflect the inner machinations of the plot, particularly in a film such as Inception? For example, Cobb's children are wearing the same clothes at the end of the story as they are in his dream 'memory' throughout the film. Is there something to be interpreted here?

JK: Costume design reflects greatly on the movement of the plot, most significantly through character development. Character development is at the forefront of costume design. The characters move the story along and with the director and the actor the costume designer helps to set the film's emotional tone in a visual way. In a more physical sense the costumes' style and color help to keep the story on track, keeping a check on time and place.

On to the second part of your question, the children's clothing is different in the final scene... look again...

So Cobb DID get home again ... right?

What do YOU think?